![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://home.inreach.com/starlord
Telescope Buyers FAQ has much of the info you need in it. -- "Knowledge is a 3 edged Sword" Kosh on Babylon 5 www.starlords.org "PowerPost2000" wrote in message ... I just got a Celestron PowerSeeker from the local Gander Mountain. It's the 60mm refractor. some specs: 700mm focal lenght 4mm & 20mm eyepieces 1.5X & 3X magnifiers According to the manual, the magnification works out to 35, 53, 105, 175, 263 and 525 power using various combinations of parts. At the 35X setting, I was able to see the rings of Saturn and 4 of Jupiter's moons. At any higher settings, it's almost impossibe to even find the planets. (I'm assuming it's due to the small field of view---but I'm not sure) Would a larger tube help? I've seen some that are over 200mm. Will a larger tube let you use more magnification? How much magnification is really needed for a good view of these planets? I'm not looking to spend thousands of dollars, but I would like something a little better. Thanks for any info you might have. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's a good info link that'll answer some of your questions. They also
have a section on what's up this week. http://skyandtelescope.com/ "PowerPost2000" wrote in message ... I just got a Celestron PowerSeeker from the local Gander Mountain. It's the 60mm refractor. some specs: 700mm focal lenght 4mm & 20mm eyepieces 1.5X & 3X magnifiers According to the manual, the magnification works out to 35, 53, 105, 175, 263 and 525 power using various combinations of parts. At the 35X setting, I was able to see the rings of Saturn and 4 of Jupiter's moons. At any higher settings, it's almost impossibe to even find the planets. (I'm assuming it's due to the small field of view---but I'm not sure) Would a larger tube help? I've seen some that are over 200mm. Will a larger tube let you use more magnification? How much magnification is really needed for a good view of these planets? I'm not looking to spend thousands of dollars, but I would like something a little better. Thanks for any info you might have. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PowerPost2000 wrote:
I just got a Celestron PowerSeeker from the local Gander Mountain. It's the 60mm refractor. some specs: 700mm focal lenght 4mm & 20mm eyepieces 1.5X & 3X magnifiers According to the manual, the magnification works out to 35, 53, 105, 175, 263 and 525 power using various combinations of parts. Don't bother trying to use the highest powers. A 60mm aperture is only good for magnifications up to about 120X under ideal conditions, so the 4mm eyepiece is not going to do you much good even on its own, let alone with the "magnifiers" (Barlow lenses, I presume). At the 35X setting, I was able to see the rings of Saturn and 4 of Jupiter's moons. At any higher settings, it's almost impossibe to even find the planets. (I'm assuming it's due to the small field of view---but I'm not sure) It certainly gets tougher to find things at high power, but at 175X and above the image will be so dim that you'll be disappointed even if you do get a view -- and forget about trying anything but the bright planets or the Moon. However, on a good night with clear and steady air, assuming you're polar-aligned, if you get something centred in your field at 35X, track for a while then 'lead' it a bit in RA, you should be able to swap in a Barlow (carefully, so as not to jar the tube out of position!) and resume viewing at 53X or 105X. Would a larger tube help? I've seen some that are over 200mm. Will a larger tube let you use more magnification? Yes. How much magnification is really needed for a good view of these planets? It depends on the seeing conditions, and what you think of as a "good view", but I imagine most amateur planetary observing is done in the 100X-300X range. I'm not looking to spend thousands of dollars, but I would like something a little better. Thanks for any info you might have. Others have referred you to a couple of FAQs. Beside your budget much depends on your interests & expectations and how you want to use the 'scope. The lowest cost for a given aperture on a decent-quality instrument will be for a Newtonian OTA on a Dobsonian mount, but there are other considerations. I recommend that you find a local observing club and attend an event where you can see various models 'in action'. -- Odysseus |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for rthe info. Guess I'll have to find a star party and have a
look at some equipment. That's your best choice. http://skyandtelescope.com/resources/organizations/ will give you a list of astro clubs in your area. Going will let you look through a lot of different scopes. There will also probably be someone who wants to sell their scope in order to upgrade. Also, start watching www.astromart.com on a regular basis to get a feel for second-hand prices. Clear Skies Chuck Taylor Do you observe the moon? Try the Lunar Observing Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lunar-observing/ Lunar Picture of the Day http://www.lpod.org/ ************************************ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Telescope for Child | Vedo | Amateur Astronomy | 11 | November 21st 03 03:38 PM |
A tale of a small telescope. | Chuck Simmons | Amateur Astronomy | 13 | August 10th 03 09:51 PM |
World's Largest Astronomical CCD Camera Installed On Palomar Observatory Telescope | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | July 29th 03 08:54 PM |
Icebound Antarctic telescope delivers first neutrino sky map (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 16th 03 02:47 AM |