![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I currently own an LX10. I've been looking at an upgrade to something
larger, maybe 11, 12" or larger SCT. Just got December 2003 Astronomy magazine and looked at the reader gallery with dozens of Mars photos, the kind of thing I'm interested in. Are they representative of the quality you can get ?. The best appears to be the 16" Pentax, presumably at some huge cost, and Damian Peach's 10" doesn't look far behind. Some of the 14" and 16" results look decidedly poor in comparison. Is a lot of this down to the processing ?. Basically is it worth paying the extra for the the difference between the sizes to view the planets etc when from these results 10" looks good ? Thanks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moons as Disks, Shadow Transits and Saturn's Divisions | edz | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | March 10th 04 09:57 PM |
Titan | Martin R. Howell | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | March 9th 04 09:44 PM |
How Young can a Kid Own a Scope? | Tony Flanders | Amateur Astronomy | 22 | December 9th 03 03:21 PM |
SMALL SCOPE + NICE BACKYARD = ENJOYABLE NIGHT! | David Knisely | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | October 27th 03 09:55 AM |
Help: Ghosting and flaring, It's my eyes, not the scope. | Scutter | Misc | 0 | August 24th 03 06:22 AM |