![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Vance Roos" wrote in message ... FROM THE ECONOMIST (see extract below). Is it really true or even almost true when the article states this? "in one of the most remarkable feats in the history of computer science, Galileo's operators completely reprogrammed the craft's computers to take advantage of modern data-compression methods." I don't know what was involved but if anyone has any views they would be interesting to hear. It was probably an ambitious feat, but I don't think it's "one of the most remarkable feats in modern computer science." People do ambitious things with computers a lot of the time... Unless there's something to it that I'm completely unaware of, I don't think any new _computer science_ ground was broken, though it was definitely an impressive thing to have done. Michael A. Covington - Associate Director Artificial Intelligence Center, The University of Georgia http://www.ai.uga.edu/~mc |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Vance Roos" wrote in message... FROM THE ECONOMIST (see extract below). Is it really true or even almost true when the article states this? "in one of the most remarkable feats in the history of computer science, Galileo's operators completely reprogrammed the craft's computers to take advantage of modern data-compression methods." I don't know what was involved but if anyone has any views they would be interesting to hear. ========= Hi Vance, Well The Economist's writers really know a lot about computers, don't they? :-) Journalists do this sort of sensationalisation out of habit probably - can you imagine what talking to one of them away from their work would be like? They just reprogrammed some of the computers - I don't wish to belittle the work of the clever people involved, but that's not miraculous. I believe something of a similar magnitude was done with the Voyager 2 probe at Uranus & Neptune, to get around the fact that the cameras wouldn't operate well so far from the sun... but I'm sure someone here recalls the details better than I. Basically it sounds like the hardware they choose to send up is always capable of being reprogrammed from the ground - probably an extra expense, but a wise precaution. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I remember being told that two of the most remarkable feats in
computer science were those of John von Neuman. Apparently when it snowed at Princeton people stumbling across his tracks, had accidents of a kind they had not had since they were small children. Cheers Martin -------------- Martin Frey N 51 02 E 0 47 -------------- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "AndyK" wrote in message ... "Vance Roos" wrote in message... FROM THE ECONOMIST (see extract below). Is it really true or even almost true when the article states this? "in one of the most remarkable feats in the history of computer science, Galileo's operators completely reprogrammed the craft's computers to take advantage of modern data-compression methods." I don't know what was involved but if anyone has any views they would be interesting to hear. ========= Hi Vance, Well The Economist's writers really know a lot about computers, don't they? :-) Journalists do this sort of sensationalisation out of habit probably - can you imagine what talking to one of them away from their work would be like? The journalist was probably just quoting the NASA press release. They just reprogrammed some of the computers - I don't wish to belittle the work of the clever people involved, but that's not miraculous. I believe something of a similar magnitude was done with the Voyager 2 probe at Uranus & Neptune, to get around the fact that the cameras wouldn't operate well so far from the sun... but I'm sure someone here recalls the details better than I. Basically it sounds like the hardware they choose to send up is always capable of being reprogrammed from the ground - probably an extra expense, but a wise precaution. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael A. Covington" wrote in message ...
It was probably an ambitious feat, but I don't think it's "one of the most remarkable feats in modern computer science." People do ambitious things with computers a lot of the time. Michael A. Covington Mere child's play compared with reprogramming a Nokia 9800s off the dish I should think. But then Nokia hasn't discovered the internet yet. The 9800s is still a bit wobbly on its legs but out of immediate danger. I just hope it doesn't try to crash into Jupiter! Chris.B |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris.B wrote:
"Michael A. Covington" wrote in message ... It was probably an ambitious feat, but I don't think it's "one of the most remarkable feats in modern computer science." People do ambitious things with computers a lot of the time. Michael A. Covington Mere child's play compared with reprogramming a Nokia 9800s off the dish I should think. But then Nokia hasn't discovered the internet yet. The 9800s is still a bit wobbly on its legs but out of immediate danger. I just hope it doesn't try to crash into Jupiter! Chris.B The other thing to remember is that the systems are not modern embedded processors, which are design for this kind of thing, but code written on 1970's flight qualified processors. They have no FLASH roms, or modern static RAMS. Offline data storage isn't a convenient gigabyte hard-disk - its a bloody tape recorder. Data is transmitted at rates that make modem access look like ethernet. No, hats off to them, Galileo presented unique problems, some due to failure admittedly. It was a bloody clever trick. Steve |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Ron
Larham wrote: "AndyK" wrote in message ... "Vance Roos" wrote in message... FROM THE ECONOMIST (see extract below). Is it really true or even almost true when the article states this? "in one of the most remarkable feats in the history of computer science, Galileo's operators completely reprogrammed the craft's computers to take advantage of modern data-compression methods." I don't know what was involved but if anyone has any views they would be interesting to hear. ========= Hi Vance, Well The Economist's writers really know a lot about computers, don't they? :-) Journalists do this sort of sensationalisation out of habit probably - can you imagine what talking to one of them away from their work would be like? Torc remarked: Pah that's nothing I got a Windows ME machine to boot this morning! Clear Skies Torc -- TAKMEOOT to reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Death to psychotronic weaponry (part 3) | Vierlingj | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 13th 04 05:45 PM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |
Invitation to have your name listed in support of well motivated ethics and ideals in science | David Norman | FITS | 0 | November 22nd 03 03:30 AM |
NASA Celebrates Educational Benefits of Earth Science Week | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | October 10th 03 04:14 PM |
Canada's fastest computer simulates galaxies, black holes (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 24th 03 08:15 PM |