![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi ,
I was just wondering how good an Lx90 really is with regards to value and appeture for money, if I decided to buy a second hand LX90 would I be getting the best value for my money. I realise there are larger appeture scopes out there, however are the optics as good and do I really need the goto. Any and all advice is always welcome regards chris |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris,
I think that the LX90 is an ideal begineers scope. There is sufficient apeture that you can see things and its stable and easy to carry around. You can do photography with it, but I wouldn't recommend it for long exposure CCD work. However, it will work good on the planets with a web cam. As for the GOTO I see far too many people come through our astronomical society and give up because they can't find anything. After 20 years I gave up trying to find things and only have telescopes with some form of GOTO or computer control. Consequently I manage to image all of the Messier objects in about 18 months. Not everyone agrees with me as some thing that is part of the fun, finding the objects. Well I am a looker, not a searcher and therefore for me, GOTO is a must. A good place to look or post a wanted ad is http://www.ukastroads.co.uk/ Lilian |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris,
I think that the LX90 is an ideal begineers scope. There is sufficient apeture that you can see things and its stable and easy to carry around. You can do photography with it, but I wouldn't recommend it for long exposure CCD work. However, it will work good on the planets with a web cam. As for the GOTO I see far too many people come through our astronomical society and give up because they can't find anything. After 20 years I gave up trying to find things and only have telescopes with some form of GOTO or computer control. Consequently I manage to image all of the Messier objects in about 18 months. Not everyone agrees with me as some thing that is part of the fun, finding the objects. Well I am a looker, not a searcher and therefore for me, GOTO is a must. A good place to look or post a wanted ad is http://www.ukastroads.co.uk/ Lilian |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 22:06:24 +0100, "chris CLARK"
wrote: Hi , I was just wondering how good an Lx90 really is Well, I've had mine for nearly a year and can think of nothing but praise for it, it's as good as I expected and more. I'd buy the same today if I didn't have one, or this one got damaged or stolen. I've used it far more than I thought I would, mainly because: - It's easy to set up and break down. - It's easy to find stuff quickly using the Autostar. A mate of mine bought a more fiddly, non-Autostar reflector, and is in the same situation as me (busy job, family responsibilities, etc.). He rarely uses it, perhaps once every couple of months; my LX90 is out nearly every clear night, if only for half an hour (if I've remembered to put it out in the garage to cool down beforehand). What can you see? Planets are pretty good: - Jupiter, its cloudbelts and moons - Saturn and its rings, on a good night you can see the Cassini division - Mars with its polar cap are good at the moment But what impressed me the most has been deep-sky, in particular the Ring and Dumbell nebulas are excellent at the moment, and Orion will be back in a couple of months time. I've used mine for some basic astrophotography, holding a camcorder up to the lens, the results aren't brilliant but are he http://www.fatcat.clara.co.uk/astro/ Only negative thing I can think of is storing it, both the scope and tripod are pretty big for todays small houses but hey, that's the price you pay. Darrell |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 22:06:24 +0100, "chris CLARK"
wrote: Hi , I was just wondering how good an Lx90 really is Well, I've had mine for nearly a year and can think of nothing but praise for it, it's as good as I expected and more. I'd buy the same today if I didn't have one, or this one got damaged or stolen. I've used it far more than I thought I would, mainly because: - It's easy to set up and break down. - It's easy to find stuff quickly using the Autostar. A mate of mine bought a more fiddly, non-Autostar reflector, and is in the same situation as me (busy job, family responsibilities, etc.). He rarely uses it, perhaps once every couple of months; my LX90 is out nearly every clear night, if only for half an hour (if I've remembered to put it out in the garage to cool down beforehand). What can you see? Planets are pretty good: - Jupiter, its cloudbelts and moons - Saturn and its rings, on a good night you can see the Cassini division - Mars with its polar cap are good at the moment But what impressed me the most has been deep-sky, in particular the Ring and Dumbell nebulas are excellent at the moment, and Orion will be back in a couple of months time. I've used mine for some basic astrophotography, holding a camcorder up to the lens, the results aren't brilliant but are he http://www.fatcat.clara.co.uk/astro/ Only negative thing I can think of is storing it, both the scope and tripod are pretty big for todays small houses but hey, that's the price you pay. Darrell |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why Teams of Co-Operating Robots Make Good Planetary Explorers | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 31st 04 06:01 PM |
Requirements / process to become a shuttle astronaut? | Dan Huizenga | Space Shuttle | 11 | November 14th 03 07:33 AM |
f/5 or f/8 newtonian? | Patrick | Amateur Astronomy | 52 | October 6th 03 12:46 AM |