![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The theory about a Big bang implosion at the end of the expansion of the
universe .... Is that still a considered possibility? On my personal observance of an albeit simple "everything that processes poops" type of theory, a constant consumption and expansion (in my opnion) would be more apt to be. If there is a more massive source of gravity in the universe that would slow or stop the expansion then it seems everything would slow and finally recede (and does so on a small scale). But upon my observances I tend to believe that the universe is more like a match at striking. Sparks fly outward and the flame grows and expands as long as the fuel for the flame exists. NS |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
B, Big, Big Bang, Big Bang Books... | socalsw | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | June 7th 04 09:17 AM |
Brief history of the big bang | Anon Imous | Astronomy Misc | 6 | November 10th 03 12:04 PM |
BIG BANG really a Big Bang BUST | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 27 | November 7th 03 10:38 AM |
Galaxies without dark matter halos? | Ralph Hartley | Research | 14 | September 16th 03 08:21 PM |
A dialogue between Mr. Big BANG and Mr. Steady STATE | Marcel Luttgens | Astronomy Misc | 12 | August 6th 03 06:15 AM |