![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All Reflecor telescope images are due
"cbreez" wrote in message ... Are all telescope images inverted ? Is there a way to change that like put on a eyepeice that corrects the image ? Inversion is an intergrate design due the optical charateristics. This applies only to reflective telescopes. Since reflector are used primarily for so-called deep space astronomy, this is not really a problem. On the other hand. a refractor which is normally used for terrestrial viewing gives an upright image. So if you are going to look for nebulae and distant galaxies the reflector is the way to go. The refractor is the telescope for terrestrial and local solar system objects. To answer your question, yes it is possible to purchase an "upright" lens for a reflector, but if you can find one of high quality it can prove to be prohibitively expensive. For really expert advice you might try www.telescope.com this is Orion Telescope's Home Page -- Wayne Thompson Napa,CA |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message k.net,
Wayne Thompson writes All Reflecor telescope images are due "cbreez" wrote in message ... Are all telescope images inverted ? Is there a way to change that like put on a eyepeice that corrects the image ? Inversion is an intergrate design due the optical charateristics. This applies only to reflective telescopes. Since reflector are used primarily for so-called deep space astronomy, this is not really a problem. On the other hand. a refractor which is normally used for terrestrial viewing gives an upright image. Minor correction, but an "astronomical" refractor will give an inverted image with a normal eyepiece. You can buy a "terrestrial" eyepiece which gives a right-way-up image, and a spotting-scope which is bought for terrestrial use - bird-watching or whatever - will have one already fitted. -- Greetings from Airstrip One! Mail to jsilverlight AT merseia.fsnet.co.uk is welcome. Or visit Jonathan's Space Place http:\\www.merseia.fsnet.co.uk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi there. You posted:
Inversion is an intergrate design due the optical charateristics. This applies only to reflective telescopes. Since reflector are used primarily for so-called deep space astronomy, this is not really a problem. On the other hand. a refractor which is normally used for terrestrial viewing gives an upright image. Well, I'm afraid that this might be a little misleading. *All* astronomical telescopes will generally invert the image (ie: make it "upside-down") unless an additional set of optics like an image erector or a special 45 degree Amici prism erecting diagonal is used. If a 90-degree star diagonal is used in a refractor, the image may or may not be upright depending on the orientation of the diagonal and the person's head. If the telescope is used terrestrially and the star diagonal/eyepiece is pointed straight up (ie: the person is looking straight down with the top of his head in the direction the telescope is pointed) the image should be upright. However, in this case, a regular 90 degree star diagonal will also *reverse* the image (left to right) so it will look like that seen in a flat mirror. Reflecting telescopes like a simple Newtonian also invert the image, but they do *not* reverse it, since they use two reflections to create the image. Cassegrain designs, like refractors, are often used with 90-degree star diagonals which will also result in a reversed image. With some smaller reflectors, it is possible to stand at an odd angle with your head oriented so that the image is "almost" upright, but with larger ones, the tube gets in the way. In any event, since there is really no "up" or "down" in space, the inversion caused by an astronomical telescope is a minor inconvenience. So if you are going to look for nebulae and distant galaxies the reflector is the way to go. The refractor is the telescope for terrestrial and local solar system objects. The refractor can also be successfully used for nebulae and distant galaxies. In fact, the small to moderate-sized "rich-field" refractors can offer outstanding views of star clusters and nebulae. The key for deep-sky objects here is *aperture*. The greater the aperture, the more you will tend to see. With refractors, again, cost of large apertures becomes prohibitive, so the reflector gives the user a little more "bang for the buck". Reflectors can also offer good views of solar system objects, so the solar system isn't just the exclusive purview of the refractor. Clear skies to you. -- David W. Knisely Prairie Astronomy Club: http://www.prairieastronomyclub.org Hyde Memorial Observatory: http://www.hydeobservatory.info/ ********************************************** * Attend the 10th Annual NEBRASKA STAR PARTY * * July 27-Aug. 1st, 2003, Merritt Reservoir * * http://www.NebraskaStarParty.org * ********************************************** |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Congressional Resolutions on Hubble Space Telescope | EFLASPO | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | April 1st 04 03:26 PM |
apparent image size | Sarah Whitney | Amateur Astronomy | 63 | March 21st 04 04:20 PM |
Moons as Disks, Shadow Transits and Saturn's Divisions | edz | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | March 10th 04 09:57 PM |
NASA Announces New Name For Space Infrared Telescope Facility | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | December 18th 03 10:59 PM |