A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » CCD Imaging
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Observable Relativistic Effects in Astronomy?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 5th 03, 12:35 AM
Pat Dolan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Observable Relativistic Effects in Astronomy?

According to the HyperPhysics site, super novae are detectable out to
8 billion light years. And according to Hubell, super novae at that
distance should have a velocity relative to earth of 0.6c. This would
result in a relativistic time dilation factor of 1.25. Consequently,
the average of luminosity curves of super novae at 8 billion light
years should be stretched out by 25% as a result of relativistic time
dilation, when compared to closer super novae. Is there any data
demonstrating this?

Also, is there any detectable difference in doppler shifting of light
from the receding arms versus the advancing arms of galaxies at 8
billion light years distance? If so, is there any difference in the
mean rotational velocity of a large sample of galaxies at 8 billion
lys and above, versus, a large sample of 1 billion 2yrs and below?

Thanks,

Pat
  #2  
Old October 6th 03, 10:31 PM
Wolf Logan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Observable Relativistic Effects in Astronomy?


"Pat Dolan" wrote in message
om...
According to the HyperPhysics site, super novae are detectable out to
8 billion light years. And according to Hubell, super novae at that
distance should have a velocity relative to earth of 0.6c. This would
result in a relativistic time dilation factor of 1.25. Consequently,
the average of luminosity curves of super novae at 8 billion light
years should be stretched out by 25% as a result of relativistic time
dilation, when compared to closer super novae. Is there any data
demonstrating this?


I believe the light curve "stretching" is one of the factors used to help
determine distance to a galaxy -- one of the reasons why amateur observation
of extragalactic supernovae (and the subsequent establishment of said
supernovae's light curves) is so valuable these days.

Also, is there any detectable difference in doppler shifting of light
from the receding arms versus the advancing arms of galaxies at 8
billion light years distance? If so, is there any difference in the
mean rotational velocity of a large sample of galaxies at 8 billion
lys and above, versus, a large sample of 1 billion 2yrs and below?


I'm not sure about rotational differences between galaxies at 8 billion ly
and those closer, but there is certainly a detectable doppler gradient
across rotating galaxies. this gradient can be used to determine the tilt of
the galaxy relative to our line-of-sight.

whether any of these effects can be detected directly by a single amateur
observer would depend on your equipment and your skill, I'd say.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Guide to the Best Spanish Language Astronomy Education MaterialsDebuts at NOAO Web Site (Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 0 January 6th 04 01:03 AM
Astronomers to Coldly Go Where No-one Has Gone Before/Canada Foundationfor Innovation Invests Over $12M in Space Exploration (Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 0 November 12th 03 02:07 AM
ANN: reprint of Clerke's HISTORY OF ASTRONOMY Bill McClain Astronomy Misc 7 October 30th 03 08:05 PM
ANN: reprint of Clerke's HISTORY OF ASTRONOMY Bill McClain Amateur Astronomy 7 October 30th 03 08:05 PM
FS: Old Astronomy Books, 23 books at $2 - $6 each Oldbooks78 Amateur Astronomy 0 October 3rd 03 07:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.