![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.space.com/news/hubble_mission_040810.html
The robotic mission to save Hubble would cost up to $2 billion, several times what a human-run Shuttle mission would cost. I predicted this and I'm wondering if it wouldn't be more prudent to make an exception for Hubble and ignore the safety rules. OTOH the success of a robotic mission would be a quantum leap for teleoperated serviciing in space. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA Details Risks to Astronauts on Mission to Hubble | Scott M. Kozel | Policy | 108 | May 11th 04 12:27 PM |
Don't Desert Hubble | Scott M. Kozel | Policy | 46 | February 17th 04 05:33 PM |
Hubble images being colorized to enhance their appeal for public - LA Times | Rusty B | Policy | 4 | September 15th 03 10:38 AM |
Booster Crossing | Chuck Stewart | Space Shuttle | 124 | September 15th 03 12:43 AM |
Canada Joins NASA 2007 Mission to Mars/York U. celebrates "Phoenix"Mars Mission Win (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 7th 03 05:57 AM |