![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So much for the new 45 degree diagonal I ordered from Apogee. It's a
complete disaster. I don't recall who said it was meant for terrestial viewing, but I'll tell you that for star splitting, it's useless. Unless the star image is in perfect focus, there are two images uncombined which resemble a split binary with members of equal magnitude. Last year, I was able to cleanly split Ras Algheti at 5" with my Tasco and its own junk EPs in 2 minutes, this year it took me 20 minutes to finally see the companion and after endless tries focusing and refocusing the Apogee zoom EP. The zoom EP is good though. What a complete waste! Warning! NEVER buy a 45 deg diagonal for astro viewing! Guess I had to learn the hard way... -- I. N. Galidakis http://users.forthnet.gr/ath/jgal/ ------------------------------------------ Eventually, _everything_ is understandable |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Typically a 45 degree diagonal has a roof prism to reverse the image
left to right. This requires the roof angle be 90 +/- seconds of arc to avoid a double image in the horizontal axis. I'm told the roof needs a coating of some specific properties to avoid a degradation of resolution in that axis too. I don't understand this, but as Warren Smith was the one who said it I'm willing to assume it's true. It's not impossible to make a good prism of this type, but it's not easy. When you get down to it there are going to be production variations in this kind of prism, and I've seen very experienced people approve roof prisms with this kind of error. (It's really obvious on an interferometer, or even with a star test, but a resolution test needs to be done with care.) Don't assume that your one example is representative of the design. Brian Ioannis wrote in message news:1092094759.618762@athnrd02... So much for the new 45 degree diagonal I ordered from Apogee. It's a complete disaster. I don't recall who said it was meant for terrestial viewing, but I'll tell you that for star splitting, it's useless. Unless the star image is in perfect focus, there are two images uncombined which resemble a split binary with members of equal magnitude. Last year, I was able to cleanly split Ras Algheti at 5" with my Tasco and its own junk EPs in 2 minutes, this year it took me 20 minutes to finally see the companion and after endless tries focusing and refocusing the Apogee zoom EP. The zoom EP is good though. What a complete waste! Warning! NEVER buy a 45 deg diagonal for astro viewing! Guess I had to learn the hard way... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |
Prism Diagonal Anti Chromatic Aberration Effect? | optidud | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | July 18th 03 04:25 AM |
Prism Diagonal Anti Chromatic Aberration Effect? | optidud | Amateur Astronomy | 23 | July 16th 03 03:51 PM |