|
|
#1
July 2nd 04, 05:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
mystic math
We compare the mass of the earth to the mass of the sun, and multiply
that ratio by the distance between them. Let the mass of the earth be M_e and the mass of the sun be M_s. Let the distance between them be r. (M_e)r/(M_s)= (5.976E27)(1.495979E13cm)/(1.989E33) =4.495E7cm=449.5km We now divide that result by the radius of the earth, R_e: 449.5km/6378.5k=0.07 Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe and nitrogen is the most abundant element in the earth atmosphere. We now compare their molar masses: H/N=1.01/14.01=0.07 And we see that H/N=(M_e)r/(M_s)(R_e) Ian Beardsley 
|
|
#2
July 2nd 04, 05:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
mystic math
Ian Beardsley wrote:
We compare the mass of the earth to the mass of the sun, and multiply that ratio by the distance between them. Let the mass of the earth be M_e and the mass of the sun be M_s. Let the distance between them be r. (M_e)r/(M_s)= (5.976E27)(1.495979E13cm)/(1.989E33) =4.495E7cm=449.5km We now divide that result by the radius of the earth, R_e: 449.5km/6378.5k=0.07 Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe and nitrogen is the most abundant element in the earth atmosphere. We now compare their molar masses: H/N=1.01/14.01=0.07 And we see that H/N=(M_e)r/(M_s)(R_e) Ian Beardsley Crank Information http://www.google.com/search?q=numer...Awww.crank.net http://www.csicop.org/cgi-bin/search...i?q=numerology
|
|
#3
July 2nd 04, 05:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
mystic math
Ian Beardsley wrote:
We compare the mass of the earth to the mass of the sun, and multiply that ratio by the distance between them. Let the mass of the earth be M_e and the mass of the sun be M_s. Let the distance between them be r. (M_e)r/(M_s)= (5.976E27)(1.495979E13cm)/(1.989E33) =4.495E7cm=449.5km We now divide that result by the radius of the earth, R_e: 449.5km/6378.5k=0.07 Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe and nitrogen is the most abundant element in the earth atmosphere. We now compare their molar masses: H/N=1.01/14.01=0.07 And we see that H/N=(M_e)r/(M_s)(R_e) Ian Beardsley Crank Information http://www.google.com/search?q=numer...Awww.crank.net http://www.csicop.org/cgi-bin/search...i?q=numerology
|
|
#5
July 2nd 04, 06:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
mystic math (now it becomes mystic)
mystic math Group: sci.astro.amateur Date: Thu, Jul 1, 2004, 9:25pm From: (Ian=A0Beardsley) We compare the mass of the earth to the mass of the sun, and multiply that ratio by the distance between them. Let the mass of the earth be M_e and the mass of the sun be M_s. Let the distance between them be r. (M_e)r/(M_s)=3D (5.976E27)(1.495979E13cm)/(1.989E33) =3D4.495E7cm=3D449.5km We now divide that result by the radius of the earth, R_e: 449.5km/6378.5k=3D0.07 Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe and nitrogen is the most abundant element in the earth atmosphere. We now compare their molar masses: H/N=3D1.01/14.01=3D0.07 And we see that H/N=3D(M_e)r/(M_s)(R_e) Ian Beardsley ----------------------------------- Now it becomes mystic. We apply the same concept to mars and get the same result. The most abundant gas in the mars atmophere is CO_2. (H)/(CO_2)=3D 1.01/44.01=3D0.02 M_m=3Dmass of mars, M_s=3Dmass of sun, r =3D the distance between them and= R_m =3D the radius of mars. We have (M_m)r/(M_s)(R_m)=3D0.02 M_m=3D6.418E26g r=3D2.279409E13cm M_s=3D1.989E33g R_m=3D3.393096E8cm (H)/(CO_2)=3D(M_m)(r)/(M_s)(R_m) Keep in mind these equations hold for a solar system that is at its peak as an orderly arrangement of parts. Eventually the order will degenerate. The sun is losing mass every day and therefore r for any of the planets will grow. The data for this study comes from "Handbook of Space Astronomy and Astrophysics" by Martin V. Zombeck, 1982 Cambridge University Press. Ian Beardsley
|
|
#6
July 2nd 04, 06:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
mystic math (now it becomes mystic)
Crank Information
http://www.google.com/search?q=numer...Awww.crank.net http://www.csicop.org/cgi-bin/search...i?q=numerology
|
|
#7
July 2nd 04, 06:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
mystic math (now it becomes mystic)
Crank Information
http://www.google.com/search?q=numer...Awww.crank.net http://www.csicop.org/cgi-bin/search...i?q=numerology
|
|
#8
July 2nd 04, 10:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
mystic math (now it becomes mystic)
mystic math (now it becomes mystic) Group: sci.astro.amateur Date: Fri, Jul 2, 2004, 5:17am (PDT+7) From: (Sam=A0Wormley) Crank Information =A0=A0=A0=A0http://www.google.com/search?q=3Dnumerology+site%3Awww.crank.n= et http://www.csicop.org/cgi-bin/search...q=3Dnumerology -------------------------------------------- Por dios, there is nothing cranky about it!!! Ian
|
|
#9
July 2nd 04, 10:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
mystic math (now it becomes mystic)
mystic math (now it becomes mystic) Group: sci.astro.amateur Date: Fri, Jul 2, 2004, 5:17am (PDT+7) From: (Sam=A0Wormley) Crank Information =A0=A0=A0=A0http://www.google.com/search?q=3Dnumerology+site%3Awww.crank.n= et http://www.csicop.org/cgi-bin/search...q=3Dnumerology -------------------------------------------- Por dios, there is nothing cranky about it!!! Ian
|
|
#10
July 2nd 04, 11:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
mystic math (now it becomes mystic)
We have read your post and we have marked you uninteresting.
Denis -- DT Replace nospam with the antithesis of hills
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| mystic math | Ian Beardsley | Amateur Astronomy | 25 | May 17th 04 04:52 AM |
| Math is no longer fun | Bob Carlson | Astronomy Misc | 19 | May 9th 04 07:53 AM |
| How Did the Jarosite Form at Meridiani? | Sir Charles W. Shults III | Astronomy Misc | 127 | April 1st 04 03:11 PM |
Linear Mode
