![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is the best pointing accuracy achieved in modern observatory
telescopes? The pointing accuracy of HST is, according to one source, one milliarcsec.* Is this correct? And is this a major factor in the increased resolution achieved with HST? (Other issues include......Was HST built of non magnetic materials to avoid effects from the earth's magnetosphere? Does one have to compensate for the gravitational effects of the earth, moon, & sun? The solar wind?.....but these aren't what I need to know) Thanks, Peter Abrahams *G. Fritz Benedict. Hubble's True First Light. STSCI Newsletter 21:1 (Winter 2004) p15. ============================= Peter Abrahams telscope.at.europa.dot.com The history of the telescope and the binocular: http://home.europa.com/~telscope/binotele.htm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Abrahams telscope.at.europa.dot.com wrote:
What is the best pointing accuracy achieved in modern observatory telescopes? All-sky, most manage several arcseconds these days (the Anglo-Australina telescope folks pride themelves on having reached almost 1" some years ago). Within a small region such as offsetting from a reference star a few arcminutes away, some manage 0.1" relative positioning. Once there, tracking can be good to rather better than 0.1" (for IR work with adaptive optics, perhaps much better) using nearby guide stars. The pointing accuracy of HST is, according to one source, one milliarcsec.* Is this correct? And is this a major factor in the increased resolution achieved with HST? The _pointing_ accuracy of HST is about 0.5 arcsecond, based on how exactly in comes back to the same position many months apart. Its _tracking_ accuracy is a few milliarcseconds - and indeed if it were worse than about 10, that would start to degrade its highest-resolution imaging modes. (Pixel size for the Advanced Camera in visible light is about 50 milliarcseconds, gets down to 25 in the UV). Tracking tells how precisely it stays pointed at the same inertial coordinates during a single observation. (Other issues include......Was HST built of non magnetic materials to avoid effects from the earth's magnetosphere? Does one have to compensate for the gravitational effects of the earth, moon, & sun? The solar wind?.....but these aren't what I need to know) Thanks, Peter Abrahams It relies on the Earth's magnetosphere to dump excess spin built up during maneuvers ("unloading the reaction wheels"), but that is done slowly. Another astronomical spacecraft, the Far-Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer, was reconfigured after gyro failures to use the Earth's magnetic field and electrical currents for fine tracking at the few arcsecond level. Incredibly, it tracks more smoothly with the remaining gyros turned off, owing to getting rid of the residual vibrations. Bill Keel |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Celestial Objects for Modern Telescopes. | Etok | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | May 16th 04 06:15 PM |
Lowell Observatory and Discovery Communications Announce Partnership To Build Innovative Telescope Technology | Ron Baalke | Technology | 0 | October 16th 03 06:17 PM |
Keck Observatory Reaches Major Milestone On Road To Expand Adaptive Optics | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 8th 03 08:18 PM |
Keck Observatory Reaches Major Milestone On Road To Expand Adaptive Optics | Ron Baalke | Technology | 0 | October 8th 03 08:17 PM |
NASA Awards Chandra X-Ray Observatory Follow-On Contract | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 27th 03 08:57 AM |