![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Would this new chip revolutionise ccd-astronomy also? It uses fulll colour
layered sensor array! http://www.dpreview.com/news/0202/02021101foveonx3.asp Julius |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Szaki" wrote in message news ![]() Would this new chip revolutionise ccd-astronomy also? It uses fulll colour layered sensor array! http://www.dpreview.com/news/0202/02021101foveonx3.asp Julius No. It has been discussed several times in the past. At present, it is _noisy_, and sensitivity is very poor. It is possible that in ten years time, a 'third generation' version, _may_ become something of interest to astronomers. It is worth noting, that Foveon have their own 'recommended application' list, and carefully exclude both astronomy, and 'low light imaging' when talking about this sensor. However they make other sensors, and in some cases recommend these for such applications. It is not 'new'. The chip was launched in the middle of last year, and cameras have been available with the sensor for several months. Best Wishes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Szaki" wrote in message news ![]() Would this new chip revolutionise ccd-astronomy also? It uses fulll colour layered sensor array! http://www.dpreview.com/news/0202/02021101foveonx3.asp Julius No. It has been discussed several times in the past. At present, it is _noisy_, and sensitivity is very poor. It is possible that in ten years time, a 'third generation' version, _may_ become something of interest to astronomers. It is worth noting, that Foveon have their own 'recommended application' list, and carefully exclude both astronomy, and 'low light imaging' when talking about this sensor. However they make other sensors, and in some cases recommend these for such applications. It is not 'new'. The chip was launched in the middle of last year, and cameras have been available with the sensor for several months. Best Wishes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
According to the article I read, they offer the Sigma camera with X3 chip,
up to 1600 ISO setting and 30 sec bulb, very low noise. That's pritty sensitive. Camera is $3000. Julius "Roger Hamlett" wrote in message ... "Szaki" wrote in message news ![]() Would this new chip revolutionise ccd-astronomy also? It uses fulll colour layered sensor array! http://www.dpreview.com/news/0202/02021101foveonx3.asp Julius No. It has been discussed several times in the past. At present, it is _noisy_, and sensitivity is very poor. It is possible that in ten years time, a 'third generation' version, _may_ become something of interest to astronomers. It is worth noting, that Foveon have their own 'recommended application' list, and carefully exclude both astronomy, and 'low light imaging' when talking about this sensor. However they make other sensors, and in some cases recommend these for such applications. It is not 'new'. The chip was launched in the middle of last year, and cameras have been available with the sensor for several months. Best Wishes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
According to the article I read, they offer the Sigma camera with X3 chip,
up to 1600 ISO setting and 30 sec bulb, very low noise. That's pritty sensitive. Camera is $3000. Julius "Roger Hamlett" wrote in message ... "Szaki" wrote in message news ![]() Would this new chip revolutionise ccd-astronomy also? It uses fulll colour layered sensor array! http://www.dpreview.com/news/0202/02021101foveonx3.asp Julius No. It has been discussed several times in the past. At present, it is _noisy_, and sensitivity is very poor. It is possible that in ten years time, a 'third generation' version, _may_ become something of interest to astronomers. It is worth noting, that Foveon have their own 'recommended application' list, and carefully exclude both astronomy, and 'low light imaging' when talking about this sensor. However they make other sensors, and in some cases recommend these for such applications. It is not 'new'. The chip was launched in the middle of last year, and cameras have been available with the sensor for several months. Best Wishes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:29:57 GMT, "Szaki" wrote:
Would this new chip revolutionise ccd-astronomy also? It uses fulll colour layered sensor array! http://www.dpreview.com/news/0202/02021101foveonx3.asp Nope, not even close. While no color sensor is very good for astronomical imaging, this one is particularly poor. It is noisy, has low sensitivity, and very poor color definition (that is, there is a lot of crosstalk between the color channels). This last problem is dealt with by using some very clever signal processing (really, what Foveon is best at), but this is of no use at all when imaging sources heavy on narrow emission line sources, as you find with many astronomical targets. I expect this technology is at least a few years away from what Canon CMOS detectors are already capable of. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:29:57 GMT, "Szaki" wrote:
Would this new chip revolutionise ccd-astronomy also? It uses fulll colour layered sensor array! http://www.dpreview.com/news/0202/02021101foveonx3.asp Nope, not even close. While no color sensor is very good for astronomical imaging, this one is particularly poor. It is noisy, has low sensitivity, and very poor color definition (that is, there is a lot of crosstalk between the color channels). This last problem is dealt with by using some very clever signal processing (really, what Foveon is best at), but this is of no use at all when imaging sources heavy on narrow emission line sources, as you find with many astronomical targets. I expect this technology is at least a few years away from what Canon CMOS detectors are already capable of. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Szaki" wrote in message news:lzbXb.28944$jk2.68624@attbi_s53... According to the article I read, they offer the Sigma camera with X3 chip, up to 1600 ISO setting and 30 sec bulb, very low noise. That's pritty sensitive. Camera is $3000. Julius It is worth understanding that astronomical CCD's, have 'ASA equivalence' figures typically over 30000ASA. As for 'low noise', forget it. The noise is variable on the colour channels. The 'top' channel, is reasonable (but still poor compared to other normal cameras on the market), but the channels in the base of the chip exhibit very poor noise behaviour. There is also a rather nasty 'crosstalk' behaviour, which can largely be processed out, when dealing with 'continous tone' images, but not on point source images... Best Wishes "Roger Hamlett" wrote in message ... "Szaki" wrote in message news ![]() Would this new chip revolutionise ccd-astronomy also? It uses fulll colour layered sensor array! http://www.dpreview.com/news/0202/02021101foveonx3.asp Julius No. It has been discussed several times in the past. At present, it is _noisy_, and sensitivity is very poor. It is possible that in ten years time, a 'third generation' version, _may_ become something of interest to astronomers. It is worth noting, that Foveon have their own 'recommended application' list, and carefully exclude both astronomy, and 'low light imaging' when talking about this sensor. However they make other sensors, and in some cases recommend these for such applications. It is not 'new'. The chip was launched in the middle of last year, and cameras have been available with the sensor for several months. Best Wishes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Szaki" wrote in message news:lzbXb.28944$jk2.68624@attbi_s53... According to the article I read, they offer the Sigma camera with X3 chip, up to 1600 ISO setting and 30 sec bulb, very low noise. That's pritty sensitive. Camera is $3000. Julius It is worth understanding that astronomical CCD's, have 'ASA equivalence' figures typically over 30000ASA. As for 'low noise', forget it. The noise is variable on the colour channels. The 'top' channel, is reasonable (but still poor compared to other normal cameras on the market), but the channels in the base of the chip exhibit very poor noise behaviour. There is also a rather nasty 'crosstalk' behaviour, which can largely be processed out, when dealing with 'continous tone' images, but not on point source images... Best Wishes "Roger Hamlett" wrote in message ... "Szaki" wrote in message news ![]() Would this new chip revolutionise ccd-astronomy also? It uses fulll colour layered sensor array! http://www.dpreview.com/news/0202/02021101foveonx3.asp Julius No. It has been discussed several times in the past. At present, it is _noisy_, and sensitivity is very poor. It is possible that in ten years time, a 'third generation' version, _may_ become something of interest to astronomers. It is worth noting, that Foveon have their own 'recommended application' list, and carefully exclude both astronomy, and 'low light imaging' when talking about this sensor. However they make other sensors, and in some cases recommend these for such applications. It is not 'new'. The chip was launched in the middle of last year, and cameras have been available with the sensor for several months. Best Wishes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe this was a seriously valid complaint with the first gen Sigma
Foveron based digital SLR (the model 9), but the preliminary test reports and comments I've seen for the new model 10 (which is barely out of the Sigma shop gates at present) show some absolutely great long exposure terrestrial nightime shots by comparison, with comments that Sigma listened to all of the complaints and responded to them. I'm not sure how this would equate to long term astro exposures, but the overall general use terrestrial test results (at least) for the new Sigma SLR tend to equal and/or best the top of the line Canon, Nikon, Fuji, Olympus, Pentax ....efforts from what I can tell. The biggest serious complaint at present is that it takes only raw format images. No gif, etc... unless you work the raw images in software to convert them. Another complaint is that it takes forever to get the huge raw format images into the computer so they can be mainpulated. A Sigma astro drawback in my book is that the Foveron chips overall dimensions are much smaller than those of the Canon's CCD chip, so the astro photo TFOV potential is seriously hindered by comparison (if my understanding of these things is correct here). Lawrence Sayre On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 11:14:59 -0000, Roger Hamlett wrote: "Szaki" wrote in message news:lzbXb.28944$jk2.68624@attbi_s53... According to the article I read, they offer the Sigma camera with X3 chip, up to 1600 ISO setting and 30 sec bulb, very low noise. That's pritty sensitive. Camera is $3000. Julius It is worth understanding that astronomical CCD's, have 'ASA equivalence' figures typically over 30000ASA. As for 'low noise', forget it. The noise is variable on the colour channels. The 'top' channel, is reasonable (but still poor compared to other normal cameras on the market), but the channels in the base of the chip exhibit very poor noise behaviour. There is also a rather nasty 'crosstalk' behaviour, which can largely be processed out, when dealing with 'continous tone' images, but not on point source images... Best Wishes "Roger Hamlett" wrote in message ... "Szaki" wrote in message news ![]() Would this new chip revolutionise ccd-astronomy also? It uses fulll colour layered sensor array! http://www.dpreview.com/news/0202/02021101foveonx3.asp Julius No. It has been discussed several times in the past. At present, it is _noisy_, and sensitivity is very poor. It is possible that in ten years time, a 'third generation' version, _may_ become something of interest to astronomers. It is worth noting, that Foveon have their own 'recommended application' list, and carefully exclude both astronomy, and 'low light imaging' when talking about this sensor. However they make other sensors, and in some cases recommend these for such applications. It is not 'new'. The chip was launched in the middle of last year, and cameras have been available with the sensor for several months. Best Wishes -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a moral being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute. Ayn Rand (in the appendix to 'Atlas Shrugged') ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A revolutionary propulsion system | Christopher | Policy | 17 | December 21st 03 09:25 PM |
A revolutionary propulsion system | Allen Meece | Policy | 5 | December 16th 03 07:29 AM |
A revolutionary propulsion system | asps | Policy | 5 | December 12th 03 12:33 AM |
A revolutionary propulsion system | Mu-Pi | Policy | 0 | December 11th 03 06:15 PM |
Attitude sensor noise | Amir Hosein Tavakoli | Policy | 4 | September 10th 03 04:02 AM |