Why aliens don't visit, simple explanation.

On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 08:07:56 -0400, "Paul R. Mays"
wrote:

Well there is another fanciful view.. that a method
that caused a device to become massless relative
to all other matter ( would require a causation
mechanism to be found for gravity that is based
on a local modification of a static field by a massive
object ) ... Then a craft would not be effected by
sub scale particle impacts and c would not apply
as a limit ... also inertia would not play a roll
to the occupants....

The proposition has been postulated that a high
electrical charge across a high dialectric constant
insulator could alter the Quantum State ( Aether)
between the production device and all other matter..


You can get one at Radio Shack for $49.95.

As Snoopy Dog Dog said, "is you for real, man?"

If you guys concentrated on the possible, like shifting planets in
their orbit (:-) or how to prove the speed of gravity, you know, it'd
be good.

D

On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 08:07:56 -0400, "Paul R. Mays"
wrote:

Well there is another fanciful view.. that a method
that caused a device to become massless relative
to all other matter ( would require a causation
mechanism to be found for gravity that is based
on a local modification of a static field by a massive
object ) ... Then a craft would not be effected by
sub scale particle impacts and c would not apply
as a limit ... also inertia would not play a roll
to the occupants....

The proposition has been postulated that a high
electrical charge across a high dialectric constant
insulator could alter the Quantum State ( Aether)
between the production device and all other matter..


You can get one at Radio Shack for $49.95.

As Snoopy Dog Dog said, "is you for real, man?"

If you guys concentrated on the possible, like shifting planets in
their orbit (:-) or how to prove the speed of gravity, you know, it'd
be good.

D

"Diesel" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 08:07:56 -0400, "Paul R. Mays"
wrote:

Well there is another fanciful view.. that a method
that caused a device to become massless relative
to all other matter ( would require a causation
mechanism to be found for gravity that is based
on a local modification of a static field by a massive
object ) ... Then a craft would not be effected by
sub scale particle impacts and c would not apply
as a limit ... also inertia would not play a roll
to the occupants....

The proposition has been postulated that a high
electrical charge across a high dialectric constant
insulator could alter the Quantum State ( Aether)
between the production device and all other matter..


You can get one at Radio Shack for $49.95.

Cannot...


As Snoopy Dog Dog said, "is you for real, man?"

Solid and varifiable


If you guys concentrated on the possible, like shifting planets in
their orbit (:-) or how to prove the speed of gravity, you know, it'd
be good.

D


Or if you could concentrate on explaining duality,
causation of gravitational variance, causation of
magnetic fields, Cause of a considered constant
value of c, Cause of a considered constant
value of c... all of which are of greater
concern than a proposed velocity of G..

"Diesel" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 08:07:56 -0400, "Paul R. Mays"
wrote:

Well there is another fanciful view.. that a method
that caused a device to become massless relative
to all other matter ( would require a causation
mechanism to be found for gravity that is based
on a local modification of a static field by a massive
object ) ... Then a craft would not be effected by
sub scale particle impacts and c would not apply
as a limit ... also inertia would not play a roll
to the occupants....

The proposition has been postulated that a high
electrical charge across a high dialectric constant
insulator could alter the Quantum State ( Aether)
between the production device and all other matter..


You can get one at Radio Shack for $49.95.

Cannot...


As Snoopy Dog Dog said, "is you for real, man?"

Solid and varifiable


If you guys concentrated on the possible, like shifting planets in
their orbit (:-) or how to prove the speed of gravity, you know, it'd
be good.

D


Or if you could concentrate on explaining duality,
causation of gravitational variance, causation of
magnetic fields, Cause of a considered constant
value of c, Cause of a considered constant
value of c... all of which are of greater
concern than a proposed velocity of G..

On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 08:07:56 -0400, "Paul R. Mays"
wrote:

duh what is a deflector shield for?
to deflect oncoming particules?

On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 08:07:56 -0400, "Paul R. Mays"
wrote:

duh what is a deflector shield for?
to deflect oncoming particules?

"dude" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 08:07:56 -0400, "Paul R. Mays"
wrote:

duh what is a deflector shield for?
to deflect oncoming particules?


Deflectors are not required for any object
that is massless in relation to all other matter...

Would not have to worrying about running into
planets, stars, asteroids ect either....

"dude" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 08:07:56 -0400, "Paul R. Mays"
wrote:

duh what is a deflector shield for?
to deflect oncoming particules?


Deflectors are not required for any object
that is massless in relation to all other matter...

Would not have to worrying about running into
planets, stars, asteroids ect either....

Perhaps some people should look at some hard science being carried out
first.

Quantum entanglement (QE) describes the situation when the fates of two
or more particles become bound together.

A change in one entangled particle results in an instant change in the
other particle, no matter how far away it is - even if it is at the
opposite end of the Universe.

It really bothered Einstein, especially since the concept that a change
in one particle was somehow communicated to the other faster than the
speed of light - nature's ultimate speed limit. He called it "spooky
action at a distance".

He believed there was something profound in the phenomenon and that
buried in its seeming absurdity lay something that could overthrow
quantum mechanics - a successful theory of the way the Universe behaves
on the atomic and sub-atomic level.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3043731.stm

There have been experiments to show that above light speed is possible at
the subatomic level. It would only become a matter of time before speed
limits based on theory are overturned.

And remember it's the THEORY or Relativity

Steve L.

You can get one at Radio Shack for $49.95.

As Snoopy Dog Dog said, "is you for real, man?"

If you guys concentrated on the possible, like shifting planets in
their orbit (:-) or how to prove the speed of gravity, you know, it'd
be good.

D

Perhaps some people should look at some hard science being carried out
first.

Quantum entanglement (QE) describes the situation when the fates of two
or more particles become bound together.

A change in one entangled particle results in an instant change in the
other particle, no matter how far away it is - even if it is at the
opposite end of the Universe.

It really bothered Einstein, especially since the concept that a change
in one particle was somehow communicated to the other faster than the
speed of light - nature's ultimate speed limit. He called it "spooky
action at a distance".

He believed there was something profound in the phenomenon and that
buried in its seeming absurdity lay something that could overthrow
quantum mechanics - a successful theory of the way the Universe behaves
on the atomic and sub-atomic level.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3043731.stm

There have been experiments to show that above light speed is possible at
the subatomic level. It would only become a matter of time before speed
limits based on theory are overturned.

And remember it's the THEORY or Relativity

Steve L.

You can get one at Radio Shack for $49.95.

As Snoopy Dog Dog said, "is you for real, man?"

If you guys concentrated on the possible, like shifting planets in
their orbit (:-) or how to prove the speed of gravity, you know, it'd
be good.

D