![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Back in freshman physics the large lecture
hall was filled to direct students to the correct curriculum. One class was the old mass thrust theory. If you could not follow the theory you were directed to a non-physics department. I still wonder to this day. I believed it was more complicated than stated. There was a function of rocket mass change with time. And a constant fuel mass burning giving thrust. A fuel mass velocity equates the theory. Assuming a constant throttle. My question was the true efficiency of fuel mass to thrust. The internal chamber structure is my question. How would a flat plate engine design differ from a the chamber? Begging the question, how do chamber designs converge to the most efficient? I figure that maybe the hottest engine is the most efficient. Making the idea that a thermal defect exists. This is energy radiated not effecting thrust. This is of course small compared to chemical thrust. But it does introduce the concept of chamber internal dynamics. How would a straight tube chamber differ from the normal cylinder with nozzle? And the exact location of the burn in the chamber be calculated? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New rocket engine by Aerojet ... | Hägar | Misc | 0 | July 25th 15 07:36 PM |
NF-104 rocket engine question | Pat Flannery | History | 21 | December 3rd 08 04:23 AM |
Engine in Rocket Park at JSC | Doug Krause | History | 9 | November 8th 06 01:27 PM |
Design, build, test a small liquid rocket engine. | jak785 | Technology | 6 | January 24th 05 01:33 AM |
Nexus Rocket Engine Test Successful; 10 Times More Thrust Than Deep Space 1 Engine and Lasts 3 Times Longer (10 years) | [email protected] | Technology | 5 | December 30th 03 07:44 PM |