![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/28/2021 5:22 PM, Snidely wrote:
JF Mezei formulated the question : If landing/takeoff from moon share the same tanks, it will be interesting to see the logic that will have to implement some "ethics": do you spend whatever fuel that is needed to land safely even if it means there isn't enough left to take off back to "gateway" ? There's a point where you do a go/no-go check.* I'm pretty sure that you can find this in the Apollo transcripts (and video/audio where that's available).* How close that is to landing depends on your ability to abort a landing; Apollo would have had to abort with the Descent Stage still attached, because AIUI you couldn't drop the descent stage very quickly. I would speculate that for Apollo there were both scenarios. Either full thrust on decent stage to regain orbit for at least part of the journey and perhaps upper stage to finish acceleration to orbit. It would depend on how much fuel you have left in the decent stage. Near the surface I would presume remaining fuel is so low that a jettison and light of ascent engine was in the checklist. Where is Henry Spencer when you need him? :-) Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moon landing for Starship | Snidely | Policy | 2 | February 2nd 21 01:29 PM |
Moon landing shock: Neil Armstrong's bizarre 'cryptic' message exposed, "Hollywood Moon Landing". | Daniel[_12_] | Misc | 1 | March 23rd 20 10:27 PM |
Watch: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon: The $100 Billion Moon Landing Fraud. | [email protected] | History | 37 | November 3rd 07 03:24 AM |
Moon Landing Hoax: Nexus of NASA Loyal Worker With Religion & Moon Landing Lies & Seniority | OM | History | 0 | September 19th 05 10:55 PM |
Blue Moon Belgian Beer For Potential Darla Starship Earth Crew | nightbat | Misc | 1 | August 27th 05 11:39 AM |