![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 08:03:44 -0500, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article , says... SN8 was tested to 12.5km and highly succesfull from launch right up until landing legs touch ground. I am curious on why SN9's test flight would be an indetical repeat instead of pushing the limits in the areas whene SN8 aced its test. Because standard experimental practice is to only change one variable so you can compare the results of two tests. In this case, they've made changes which impact the final landing burn. So, they're keeping everything else the same. Once they stick the landing, then they'll expand the rest of the flight envelope. That's a goal - but this is an analog world, after all, and it's not always, or often, possible or practical to achieve that level of isolation without disturbing the rest of the system(s) in unpredictable ways, for suitable levels of complexity. -- Pete Stickney From the Foothills of the Florida Alps |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dragon2 test flight | Rocket Man | Policy | 8 | March 6th 19 04:06 PM |
Successful Falcon Heavy test flight | Jeff Findley[_6_] | Policy | 0 | February 7th 18 11:16 AM |
CEV Test Flight | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 3 | March 24th 08 03:23 PM |
Flight Test Vasimr? | John Schutkeker | Policy | 19 | January 25th 06 08:58 PM |
separation for flight test | Pascal zur Nieden | Space Shuttle | 3 | August 26th 05 08:44 AM |