![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Two defunct orbital masses seem to have not collided.
https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2020/10/leolabs-tracking-high-risk-collision-probability/ "Roughly one hour after the time of possible collision, LeoLabs confirmed “No indication of collision” via a statement on Twitter. [...] Both objects, an old Soviet-era satellite and the upper stage of a Chang Zheng 4C Chinese rocket, are inoperable and uncontrollable. Therefore, there was no way to move one of them out of the way to avoid the potential collision." There's a lot of stuff up there like this. I know various sorts of clean-up ideas have been floated. India has already demonstrated that satellite-killer weapons aren't the answer (2019). Two "relatively simple" ideas would be small satellites that dock with the corpse, and either provide retro-rockets for a de-orbit burn, or inflate/extend something to increase drag. These are likely viable only for the lowest targets and may be limited in applicable sizing. The other downside is that valuable materials are atomized during burn-up. Space tugs can be used to collect corpses into a cemetary orbit, but we don't have a lot of space tugs in use yet. A cemetary orbit would allow future "mining" of the materials, but is probably not fun to manage. Then there's devices like the X-37B. Bring the corpse back intact and near term. What are the [estimated] limits of the X-37B's orbital reach? Is launch vehicle capability or re-entry profile the more limiting factor? What do you with ears to ground think will be a first viable demonstration of debris control? /dps -- "This is all very fine, but let us not be carried away be excitement, but ask calmly, how does this person feel about in in his cooler moments next day, with six or seven thousand feet of snow and stuff on top of him?" _Roughing It_, Mark Twain. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The problem with Time | IAM | Misc | 0 | June 23rd 18 12:22 AM |
The problem with Time | Double-A[_4_] | Misc | 0 | June 22nd 18 09:40 PM |
The problem with Time | Mark Earnest[_2_] | Misc | 0 | June 22nd 18 01:10 PM |
The problem with Time | IAM | Misc | 0 | June 22nd 18 03:44 AM |
The Real Problem of Time in Physics | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 4 | July 2nd 16 05:37 PM |