![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Current issue of AW&ST devoted to Hydrogen in Aviation.
https://aviationweek.com/awst_current On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 23:48:10 -0400, JF Mezei wrote: Before you scream this isn't space related... Airbus announced a project to study hydrogen powered airplanes. Basically tune current jet engines to burn H2 instead of kerosene, and run fuel cells to supply plane with electricity. Currently, there are spinning generators attached to the jet engines to produce electricity. Question: are fuel cells more efficient at producing electricity than using mechanical power from a jet engine to drive a generator? Since the Shuttle only had spinning turbines for 8 minutes of a flight out of a 14 day trip, it made sense to have fuel cells, especially since the water served the crew as well. But for an aircraft where the jet engines kinda have to spin for the whole flight, I am curious if diverting H2 to fuel cells is more efficient than sending to engines to spin some more to drive generators. Can fuel cells run off air, or do they need LOX to mix with LH2 to produce power? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why the planes did not crumple | LarryG | Amateur Astronomy | 43 | June 21st 06 09:59 AM |
Why the planes did not crumple | Mark Smith | Amateur Astronomy | 9 | June 16th 06 08:37 AM |
Monatomic hydrogen as fuel - need a low bond energy to single hydrogen atoms. | Robert Clark | Astronomy Misc | 6 | March 29th 06 08:35 AM |
Monatomic hydrogen as fuel - need a low bond energy to single hydrogen atoms. | Robert Clark | Policy | 4 | March 23rd 06 11:16 PM |
Question of planes | Mark F. | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | November 8th 04 04:42 AM |