![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Imagine you are out one night and you see a plane flying over your head.
Someone might note that it is 10 km high. Now imagine that exactly behind the plane is the Andromeda galaxy. No one is going to say that the galaxy is 2.5 million light years high, one would say it is 2.5 million light years away. Conversely, for the plane no one would say it is 10 km away if it is directly over head. So at what point does something cease to be up and starts to be far. Now this might seem like being only semantics, and it is. But I think that discussing this particular point of semantics sheds light on how people perceive space. I have my own opinion on the matter but I will give it only after others have given their opinion, because I don't want this thread to be about discussing my opinion. I want it to be about seeing what are the different opinions out there. Alain Fournier |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, October 10, 2020 at 11:46:52 AM UTC-4, Alain Fournier wrote:
Imagine you are out one night and you see a plane flying over your head. Someone might note that it is 10 km high. Now imagine that exactly behind the plane is the Andromeda galaxy. No one is going to say that the galaxy is 2.5 million light years high, one would say it is 2.5 million light years away. Conversely, for the plane no one would say it is 10 km away if it is directly over head. So at what point does something cease to be up and starts to be far. Now this might seem like being only semantics, and it is. But I think that discussing this particular point of semantics sheds light on how people perceive space. I have my own opinion on the matter but I will give it only after others have given their opinion, because I don't want this thread to be about discussing my opinion. I want it to be about seeing what are the different opinions out there. Alain Fournier I suspect it is mostly human nature. At least around here, we consider anything north of us to be "up" there. Conversely, anything south is "down" there. Being on the east coast, anything west is "out" there. Dean |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dean Markley" wrote in message
... On Saturday, October 10, 2020 at 11:46:52 AM UTC-4, Alain Fournier wrote: Imagine you are out one night and you see a plane flying over your head. Someone might note that it is 10 km high. Now imagine that exactly behind the plane is the Andromeda galaxy. No one is going to say t hat the galaxy is 2.5 million light years high, one would say it is 2.5 million light years away. Conversely, for the plane no one would say it is 10 km away if it is directly over head. So at what point does something cease to be up and starts to be far. Now this might seem like being only semantics, and it is. But I think that discussing this particular point of semantics sheds light on how people perceive space. I have my own opinion on the matter but I will give it only after others have given their opinion, because I don't want this thread to be about discussing my opinion. I want it to be about seeing what are the different opinions out there. Alain Fournier I suspect it is mostly human nature. At least around here, we consider anything north of us to be "up" there. Conversely, anything south is "down" there. Being on the east coast, anything west is "out" there. Dean I suspect anything that's within Earth's atmosphere is "high" and even in most cases, if it's within the gravitational influence "high" often applies. Beyond that I think it's "out there" or "away". -- Greg D. Moore http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/ CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses. http://www.quicr.net IT Disaster Response - https://www.amazon.com/Disaster-Resp...dp/1484221834/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct/12/2020 at 09:15, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote :
"Dean Markley"Â* wrote in message ... On Saturday, October 10, 2020 at 11:46:52 AM UTC-4, Alain Fournier wrote: Imagine you are out one night and you see a plane flying over your head. Someone might note that it is 10 km high. Now imagine that exactly behind the plane is the Andromeda galaxy. No one is going to say t hat the galaxy is 2.5 million light years high, one would say it is 2.5 million light years away. Conversely, for the plane no one would say it is 10 km away if it is directly over head. So at what point does something cease to be up and starts to be far. Now this might seem like being only semantics, and it is. But I think that discussing this particular point of semantics sheds light on how people perceive space. I have my own opinion on the matter but I will give it only after others have given their opinion, because I don't want this thread to be about discussing my opinion. I want it to be about seeing what are the different opinions out there. Alain Fournier I suspect it is mostly human nature.Â* At least around here, we consider anything north of us to be "up" there.Â* Conversely, anything south is "down" there.Â* Being on the east coast, anything west is "out" there. Dean I suspect anything that's within Earth's atmosphere is "high" and even in most cases, if it's within the gravitational influence "high" often applies. Beyond that I think it's "out there" or "away". So for you the moon is high not away? Alain Fournier |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Alain Fournier" wrote in message ...
On Oct/12/2020 at 09:15, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote : "Dean Markley" wrote in message ... On Saturday, October 10, 2020 at 11:46:52 AM UTC-4, Alain Fournier wrote: Imagine you are out one night and you see a plane flying over your head. Someone might note that it is 10 km high. Now imagine that exactly behind the plane is the Andromeda galaxy. No one is going to say t hat the galaxy is 2.5 million light years high, one would say it is 2.5 million light years away. Conversely, for the plane no one would say it is 10 km away if it is directly over head. So at what point does something cease to be up and starts to be far. Now this might seem like being only semantics, and it is. But I think that discussing this particular point of semantics sheds light on how people perceive space. I have my own opinion on the matter but I will give it only after others have given their opinion, because I don't want this thread to be about discussing my opinion. I want it to be about seeing what are the different opinions out there. Alain Fournier I suspect it is mostly human nature. At least around here, we consider anything north of us to be "up" there. Conversely, anything south is "down" there. Being on the east coast, anything west is "out" there. Dean I suspect anything that's within Earth's atmosphere is "high" and even in most cases, if it's within the gravitational influence "high" often applies. Beyond that I think it's "out there" or "away". So for you the moon is high not away? Alain Fournier Like I said, "even in most cases". I've heard both. -- Greg D. Moore http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/ CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses. http://www.quicr.net IT Disaster Response - https://www.amazon.com/Disaster-Resp...dp/1484221834/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alain Fournier writes:
...................... So at what point does something cease to be up and starts to be far. When it crosses from being in a place you might reach (up) vs a place you cannot reach (far)? I like the phrase though. "High and far". To me sounds like a title to a great SF space or space travel story. Or maybe a factual early history of spaceflight novel. If I write such a story can I have the rights to the phrase as a title? What would you charge me? :-) Would you settle for the credit in the 'Acknowlegements' Section? Of course, if I was writing the book in the mid-70's it'd be about a bicoastal trip across the USA in a VW microbus, involving a lot of cannibis of the TH vs CB 'C' variety. :-) :-) Dave |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct/12/2020 at 15:07, David Spain wrote :
Alain Fournier writes: ...................... So at what point does something cease to be up and starts to be far. When it crosses from being in a place you might reach (up) vs a place you cannot reach (far)? I like the phrase though. "High and far". To me sounds like a title to a great SF space or space travel story. Or maybe a factual early history of spaceflight novel. If I write such a story can I have the rights to the phrase as a title? What would you charge me? :-) Would you settle for the credit in the 'Acknowlegements' Section? I don't think I have any legal rights on the phrase, so you can use it as you wish. But if you want to pay me for it, a copy of the book would be great :-) Alain Fournier |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct/12/2020 at 13:34, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote :
"Alain Fournier"Â* wrote in message ... On Oct/12/2020 at 09:15, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote : "Dean Markley"Â* wrote in message ... On Saturday, October 10, 2020 at 11:46:52 AM UTC-4, Alain Fournier wrote: Imagine you are out one night and you see a plane flying over your head. Someone might note that it is 10 km high. Now imagine that exactly behind the plane is the Andromeda galaxy. No one is going to say t hat the galaxy is 2.5 million light years high, one would say it is 2.5 million light years away. Conversely, for the plane no one would say it is 10 km away if it is directly over head. So at what point does something cease to be up and starts to be far. Now this might seem like being only semantics, and it is. But I think that discussing this particular point of semantics sheds light on how people perceive space. I have my own opinion on the matter but I will give it only after others have given their opinion, because I don't want this thread to be about discussing my opinion. I want it to be about seeing what are the different opinions out there. Alain Fournier I suspect it is mostly human nature.Â* At least around here, we consider anything north of us to be "up" there.Â* Conversely, anything south is "down" there.Â* Being on the east coast, anything west is "out" there. Dean I suspect anything that's within Earth's atmosphere is "high" and even in most cases, if it's within the gravitational influence "high" often applies. Beyond that I think it's "out there" or "away". So for you the moon is high not away? Alain Fournier Like I said, "even in most cases". I've heard both. Personally I wouldn't say the Moon is high, at least not in the sense that an air-plane is high, not in the sense of distance from the ground. I might say that the Moon is high as we would say the sun is high at noon, or even simply say high noon. But that isn't an indication of distance but rather an indication of position in the sky. On the other hand if we say that an air-plane is high, it can very well be low on the horizon, what we are talking about when we say that an air-plane is high, is the distance between the plane and the ground. So why wouldn't I say that the Moon is 380,000 km high? For me it isn't a question of gravitational influence, it is a question of geometry. If someone on the Moon looks at Earth he doesn't see the "ground". He sees a ball with stars around it. Someone in an air-plane can't see stars around the Earth, they might see stars in one direction and Earth in another, but if you see stars in one direction, you see Earth in the opposite direction. From the Moon, you can easily see that Earth doesn't fill half the directions. For me, to be far enough from Earth to see it not as half (or nearly half) of all directions is where I would sense being far from Earth, not just high. I would put it at about 2000 km. Below that, even if technically Earth doesn't fill half the sky, you don't easily see that it fills less than half the sky. Of course as I said from the onset, this is just semantics. And I am very far from being an expert in semantics. So my opinion here is just that, an opinion. Still if some of you have other opinions on where you start being far, I would like to hear them. I think that gives an interesting perspective on your perception of space. Alain Fournier |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2020-10-13 2:48, Alain Fournier wrote:
On Oct/12/2020 at 13:34, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote : "Alain Fournier"Â* wrote in message ... On Oct/12/2020 at 09:15, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote : "Dean Markley"Â* wrote in message ... On Saturday, October 10, 2020 at 11:46:52 AM UTC-4, Alain Fournier wrote: Imagine you are out one night and you see a plane flying over your head. Someone might note that it is 10 km high. Now imagine that exactly behind the plane is the Andromeda galaxy. No one is going to say t hat the galaxy is 2.5 million light years high, one would say it is 2.5 million light years away. Conversely, for the plane no one would say it is 10 km away if it is directly over head. So at what point does something cease to be up and starts to be far. Now this might seem like being only semantics, and it is. But I think that discussing this particular point of semantics sheds light on how people perceive space. I have my own opinion on the matter but I will give it only after others have given their opinion, because I don't want this thread to be about discussing my opinion. I want it to be about seeing what are the different opinions out there. Alain Fournier I suspect it is mostly human nature.Â* At least around here, we consider anything north of us to be "up" there.Â* Conversely, anything south is "down" there.Â* Being on the east coast, anything west is "out" there. Dean I suspect anything that's within Earth's atmosphere is "high" and even in most cases, if it's within the gravitational influence "high" often applies. Beyond that I think it's "out there" or "away". So for you the moon is high not away? Alain Fournier Like I said, "even in most cases". I've heard both. Personally I wouldn't say the Moon is high, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_High_the_Moon |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2020-10-14 3:54, JF Mezei wrote:
Whether at noon or near sunset, the sun always occupies the same number of degrees in your field of vision (as I recall about 5°). No, it is about 0.5 degrees. It varies a little over a year due to the ellipticity of the Earth's orbit. According to https://flatearth.ws/sun-apparent-size, the size varies between 0.524° and 0.5418°. Near sunset the apparent vertical diameter is reduced by atmospheric refraction. The horizontal diameter is not changed, I believe. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High-Q | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 23 | October 4th 06 08:48 PM |
How High Is Up ??? | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 3 | June 1st 06 12:26 AM |
Excitement in high energy physics, really high energy | Joe Fischer | Astronomy Misc | 26 | December 16th 05 05:00 AM |
High in the south right now | david | UK Astronomy | 5 | April 14th 04 05:46 PM |
High-end systems | chrBobsci | SETI | 30 | February 7th 04 01:11 PM |