Constant Speed of Light: the False Fundamental Axiom of Modern Physics

Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light postulate is the fundamental axiom of modern physics (see the two texts below). Accordingly, if this axiom is false (it is!), physics is long dead (exists as a farce/ideology):

"If there's one thing every schoolboy knows about Einstein and his theory of relativity, it is that the speed of light in vacuum is constant. No matter what the circumstances, light in vacuum travels at the same speed... The speed of light is the very keystone of physics, the seemingly sure foundation upon which every modern cosmological theory is built, the yardstick by which everything in the universe is measured. [...] The only aspect of the universe that didn't change was the speed of light. And ever since, the constancy of the speed of light has been woven into the very fabric of physics, into the way physics equations are written, even into the notation used. Nowadays, to "vary" the speed of light is not even a swear word: It is simply not present in the vocabulary of physics." https://www.amazon.com/Faster-Than-S.../dp/0738205257

"He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of that theory. Thus a constant speed of light is embedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels." http://www.thegreatdebate.org.uk/VSLRevPrnt.html

The formula

(frequency) = (speed of light) / (wavelength)

allows the introduction of two axioms that push physics in opposite directions:

Axiom 1 (Einstein's physics): The speed of light is constant. Immediate corollary (obviously absurd): Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) an inversely proportional wavelength shift.

Axiom 2 (Einstein-free physics): The wavelength of light is constant (for a given emitter). Immediate corollary: Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a proportional speed-of-light shift.

Axiom 1, false and even nonsensical, killed physics (converted it into an insane ideology).

Axiom 2, correct and easily justifiable, will resurrect physics (if it's not too late). Its immediate corollary will become the main law of the new science.

Five important corollaries of Axiom 2:

Corollary 1 (the fundamental law of future physics): Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a proportional speed-of-light shift.

Corollary 2: If the emitter and the observer (receiver) travel towards each other with relative speed v, the speed of light as measured by the observer is c' = c+v, as per Newton's theory.

Corollary 3: Spacetime and gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime) don't exist. LIGO's "discoveries" are fakes.

Corollary 4: Light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as ordinary falling bodies - near Earth's surface the accelerations of falling photons is g = 9.8 m/s^2. Accordingly, there is no gravitational time dilation - Einstein's general relativity is nonsense.

Corollary 5: The Hubble redshift is due to light slowing down as it travels through vacuum. The universe is static, not expanding.

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev

The fundamental axiom of future (Einstein-free) physics:

The wavelength of light is constant (for a given emitter).

Is the axiom correct? Judging from the three scenarios below, it is:

(A) The observer starts moving relative to the emitter https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE. The wavelength (distance between light pulses) obviously remains constant while the frequency and the speed of the pulses vary proportionally for the moving observer, in violation of Einstein's relativity.

(B) The emitter starts moving relative to the observer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsVxC_NR64M. It is universally taught that the wavelength of light varies with the speed of the emitter, as shown in the video, but this contradicts the principle of relativity. If the wavelength varied, the emitter would measure it regularly, inside his spaceship, and so he would be able to calculate his speed without looking outside. The wavelength of light is constant, independent of the speed of the emitter.

(C) Light falls in a gravitational field. The frequency and the speed of falling light vary proportionally, and accordingly the wavelength remains constant. This is clearly shown he

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: "Consider a falling object. ITS SPEED INCREASES AS IT IS FALLING. Hence, if we were to associate a frequency with that object the frequency should increase accordingly as it falls to earth. Because of the equivalence between gravitational and inertial mass, WE SHOULD OBSERVE THE SAME EFFECT FOR LIGHT. So lets shine a light beam from the top of a very tall building. If we can measure the frequency shift as the light beam descends the building, we should be able to discern how gravity affects a falling light beam. This was done by Pound and Rebka in 1960. They shone a light from the top of the Jefferson tower at Harvard and measured the frequency shift. The frequency shift was tiny but in agreement with the theoretical prediction. Consider a light beam that is travelling away from a gravitational field. Its frequency should shift to lower values. This is known as the gravitational red shift of light." https://courses.physics.illinois.edu...re13/L13r.html

More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev

Two crucial biconditionals (if and only if propositions):

Biconditional 1: The speed of light is constant as per Einstein IF AND ONLY IF the wavelength of light is variable.

Biconditional 2: The speed of light is variable as per Newton IF AND ONLY IF the wavelength of light is constant for a given emitter.

Both biconditionals are immediate logical consequences of the formula

(frequency) = (speed of light) / (wavelength)

Both the antecedent and the consequent in Biconditional 2 are true. The consequent,

"the wavelength of light is constant for a given emitter",

will become the fundamental axiom of future, Einstein-free physics (the fundamental axiom of present, Einstein's physics is "the speed of light is constant", the antecedent in Biconditional 1).

See mo https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev