![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Now let's see what this does to the frequency of the light. We know that even without special relativity, observers moving at different velocities measure different frequencies. (This is the reason the pitch of an ambulance changes as it passes you it doesn't change if you're on the ambulance). This is called the Doppler shift, and for small relative velocity v it is easy to show that the frequency shifts from f to f(1+v/c)... There are relativistic corrections, but these are negligible here." http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/~pf7a/modd35.pdf
Einstein's physics: The frequency shifts from f to f(1+v/c) = (c+v)/λ The speed of light does not shift: c' = c The wavelength shifts from λ to λ' = λc/(c+v) Einstein's physics is obviously absurd - the motion of the observer cannot change the wavelength of the incoming light: Doppler effect - when an observer moves toward a stationary source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE The University of Texas at Austin: "Thus, the moving observer sees a wave possessing the same wavelength [...] but a different frequency [...] to that seen by the stationary observer." http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teachin...ml/node41.html Einstein-free physics: The frequency shifts from f to f(1+v/c) = (c+v)/λ The speed of light shifts from c to c' = c+v The wavelength does not shift: λ' = λ The last equation, λ' = λ, can be generalized: The wavelength of light is constant for a given emitter. This will become the fundamental axiom of future, Einstein-free physics. Important corollaries of the fundamental axiom: Corollary 1: Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a proportional speed-of-light shift. Corollary 2: If the emitter and the observer (receiver) travel towards each other with relative speed v, the speed of light as measured by the observer is c' = c+v, as per Newton's theory. Corollary 3: Spacetime and gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime) don't exist. LIGO's "discoveries" are fakes. Corollary 4: Light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as ordinary falling bodies - near Earth's surface the accelerations of falling photons is g = 9.8 m/s^2. Accordingly, there is no gravitational time dilation - Einstein's general relativity is nonsense. Corollary 5: The Hubble redshift is due to light slowing down as it travels through vacuum. The universe is static, not expanding. See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The root of all the evil in physics is special relativity, or, more precisely, Einstein's 1905 false constant-speed-of-light postulate:
"Lee [Smolin] and I discussed these paradoxes at great length for many months, starting in January 2001. We would meet in cafés in South Kensington or Holland Park to mull over the problem. THE ROOT OF ALL THE EVIL WAS CLEARLY SPECIAL RELATIVITY. All these paradoxes resulted from well known effects such as length contraction, time dilation, or E=mc^2, all basic predictions of special relativity." Joao Magueijo, Faster Than the Speed of Light, p. 250 http://www.amazon.com/Faster-Than-Sp.../dp/0738205257 "...Dr. Magueijo said. "We need to drop a postulate, perhaps the constancy of the speed of light." http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/31/sc...-relative.html Joao Magueijo, Niayesh Afshordi, Stephon Alexander: "So we have broken fundamentally this Lorentz invariance which equates space and time [...] It's the other postulate of relativity, that of constancy of c, that has to give way..." https://youtu.be/kbHBBtsrU1g?t=1431 As the above quotations show, physicists do try to tell the truth sometimes but there is a problem. Modern physics is entirely predicated on the constant-speed-of-light falsehood and will collapse without it. In this regard, telling the truth is suicidal: "The whole of physics is predicated on the constancy of the speed of light," Joao Magueijo, a cosmologist at Imperial College London and pioneer of the theory of variable light speed, told Motherboard. "So we had to find ways to change the speed of light without wrecking the whole thing too much." https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/a...t-speed-slowed More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Difference Between Einstein's Physics and Einstein-Free Physics | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | July 18th 20 12:55 AM |
Towards Einstein-Free Physics | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 1st 20 01:40 AM |
Einstein's Physics and Einstein-Free Physics | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | June 15th 20 06:08 PM |
How to Free Physics from Einstein's Legacy | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | May 23rd 20 03:59 PM |
Towards Einstein-Free Physics | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | July 13th 19 10:06 AM |