Action reaction principle can be violated

1) From the thread on NG free.it.scienza.fisica entitled

The third principle of dynamics sometimes does not apply?

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=...ca/eUUCW9P6NVA

On 27/04/16 20:00, Giorgio Pastore wrote:



Interesting. It increases the personal statistics of people who should know it but they don't (about the possibility of violating the III principle of dynamics).

And many graduated in physics seem to ignore it (or to have forgotten it if they knew it in the past).

Your post confirms that this is a widespread gap. I also add that the electromagnetic case is not the only one.

It doesn't apply to apparent forces.

It doesn't apply to the case of forces that are not attributable to sums of couple interactions.

Giorgio Pastore (Professor at University of Trieste)



………………….


PhD Valter Moretti says that practically the III principle makes no sense in electrodynamics probably for the facts that Newton didn’t know electrodynamics www.asps.it/azione.htm



…………..



2) A webpage by Professor Elio Fabri, former professor at University of Pisa with whom I've had countless controversies form many years (over 15 years) about the violability of Newton third principle. At least in Italy recently he has become the best academic propagandist of the violability in electrodynamics of the principle of action and reaction



With this paper basically he practically dismantles years and years of controversies with the undersigned

http://www.sagredo.eu/varie/terzopr-em.pdf

from www.asps.it/setupdip.htm

…………………………………………†¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.



3) The experimental demonstration of PNN in enclosed box directly visible at ASPS laboratory.



4) Videoclips of tests along all history of PNN since the first public events that begin 2001 .

From Asps Url www.asps.it and from Asps issue Nova Astronautica

www.asps.it/na.htm (since 1981)



5) Latest tests and theoretical considerations are reachable from the primary url in Italian www.asps.it and for what concerns the last 2 years from the links IN ENGLISH of ASPS Collaborator Sergio Zanotti



https://neolegesmotus.com/2017/09/13...s-part-i-f449/



https://neolegesmotus.com/2017/09/15...types-part-ii/



https://neolegesmotus.com/2017/12/05...t-pnn-inertia/



https://neolegesmotus.com/2018/01/06...nn-spacecraft/



https://neolegesmotus.com/2018/07/03...-taking-shape/



https://neolegesmotus.com/2018/08/02...-expectations/



https://neolegesmotus.com/2018/09/04...f-wave-dipole/



https://neolegesmotus.com/2018/10/23...th-f432-tests/



https://neolegesmotus.com/2018/11/23...le-cart-tests/



https://neolegesmotus.com/2018/12/07...f-little-cart/



https://neolegesmotus.com/2019/01/26...on-kern-scale/



https://neolegesmotus.com/2019/03/08...ing-prototype/



https://neolegesmotus.com/2019/04/16/f432-roadshow/



https://neolegesmotus.com/2019/08/16...econd-variant/



https://neolegesmotus.com/2019/10/06...ps-activities/

Yeah sure...

Tell you what, place a big mother electromagnet in a satellite whose
polarity switches depending upon the hemisphere it is above in Earth
orbit and tell me how its performance compares to an EM frustum.

Show me the EM frustum working inside a set of Helmholtz coils or
nu-metal magnetically shielded chamber that neutralize the Earth's
magnetic field and get back to me with that measured force report in
yocto-Newtons.

Dave