![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
CMBR 2020.
------------ http://members.optusnet.com.au/maxkeon/cmbr2020.html These equations describe our universe. c = SQR(2*G*M/r) M = (c^2*r/(2*G)) E = M*c^2 r = (2*G*M/c^2) (apparent) c = 299781277.9 (observed) M = 8.4883588e52 E = 7.6284e69 r = 1.26e26 In the following two images the mass of the universe is reduced according to M=M/1.1 . The chosen wavelength for the current universe (9.2e-6 meters) reduces to compare with the emission peak of a 2.73 K radiator when the universe was in a lesser evolved state, where the CMBR can be presumed to have been generated in some kind of primeval fireball. The 2.73 degree blackbody radiator curve is set up so that it can be compared. It is NOT according to the 'primeval fireball' scenario. The spectral energy density (SED) for each step of the 2.73 K curve is determined using Planck's formula. Frequency is calculated according to the stage of evolution at each step (speed of light). The emphasis is placed on spectral energy density (SED) per wavelength rather than frequency. Both systems are equally relevant, but they each paint a very different picture. The current universe obviously has a non zero temperature and the same applies for the universe at any stage of its evolution. The SED of the universe will necessarily be proportional to the energy of the universe per E=Mc^2. I've chosen E^.5/c^3 as the proportionality factor, rather than some random multiplier. But the credibility of the multiplier is not important in this case. http://members.optusnet.com.au/maxkeon/cmbr1.jpg http://members.optusnet.com.au/maxkeon/cmbr2.jpg -------------------------------------------------------------- A blackbody CMBR generated in a single event in the early universe can't contain any input at all from any other source. -------------------------------------------------------------- The 1X curve scribed by the blue circles is the SED of the evolving universe, while the .01X curve represents the assumed SED attributable to the 1% of the universe which is deemed to carry a clear CMBR signature. But that will be dragged downward toward zero when the input from the readily identifiable matter which extends above the blackbody curve is removed. So all that's left is the input from matter in the supposedly enclosed time zone from which the CMBR was released into the universe. What kind of result would one expect? Nobody can claim proof of anything in these circumstances. According to SED per frequency the universe is contained at a constant radius of 1.26e26 meters for every stage of evolution. But that radius is measured with a variable measuring unit (r'=r*(c'/c)). When c=0 r'=0. The circumference and radius of the universe = 0. When we look out into the universe we are looking toward exactly the same point in every direction, so the focal point for the SED of an earlier universe is everywhere around us at the apparent radius of that universe from what we observe as the origin, 1.26e26 meters away from us. The SED per wavelength graph limits our universe to our current state of evolution. We cannot comprehend beyond that. That's our universe in a nutshell. ----- Max Keon |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Where did the CMBR we see from? | Lion Kimbro | Astronomy Misc | 6 | December 21st 06 02:04 PM |
Diameter of CMBR shell? | Jeff Root | Astronomy Misc | 3 | June 16th 06 04:47 PM |
CMBR (the final chapter (2)) | Max Keon | Astronomy Misc | 14 | May 24th 04 02:12 PM |
CMBR? Not in the Big Bang Universe. | Max Keon | Astronomy Misc | 10 | November 17th 03 08:32 PM |
CMBR question | [email protected] \(formerly\) | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 14th 03 12:56 AM |