![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov/15/2019 at 03:35, JF Mezei wrote :
On 2019-11-14 19:54, Alain Fournier wrote: Steel has much lower conductivity than aluminium. So this isn't as much a problem as it would be if aluminium was used. As I recall, no aluminium was bare on the shuttle, was all protected by tiles/blankets. And the tiles were thick and heavy to ensure the aluminium remain nice and comfy cool. Depends on what you call comfy cool. According to https://www.airspacemag.com/how-thin...iles-12580671/ "The tiles keep the orbiter’s aluminum skin at 350 degrees or less." They don't say it that site, but those are Fahrenheit degrees, so that is 177 Celsius degrees. That's comfy and cool enough for the aluminium structure to conserve integrity but it is way to hot for electronics or humans. It wasn't much of an issue because it was only for a short while and only the outer surface of the aluminium structure experienced those temperatures. But once the Shuttle was on the ground, you wanted to let that heat dissipate. And since the tiles were such great insulation, that heat didn't dissipate all that well outwards. Alain Fournier |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Using structural steel for spacecraft | William Mook[_2_] | Policy | 1 | November 30th 14 07:47 AM |
Steel mesh on Booster | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 5 | July 4th 06 07:03 PM |
What's an x.xx" steel disk? (in Celestron ad) | Hari Seldon | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | September 10th 03 04:15 AM |
Stronger Steel | sanman | Technology | 0 | July 18th 03 08:55 PM |
Stronger Steel | sanman | Policy | 0 | July 18th 03 08:54 PM |