![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, November 1, 2019 at 12:06:15 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
there must be a mistake somewhere.. 'they' (i don't know who they are) keep listing Gravity as one of the forces of nature... What year did Gravity become a ...force???? When it became a "fundamental interaction" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction 1. Gravity. 2. The weak force. 3. Electromagnetism. 4. The strong force. These are called the four fundamental forces of nature, and they govern everything that happens in the universe. On the other hand... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity .... relativity says otherwise. When not dealing with relativistic speeds, Nertwon's gravitational formulae work just fine. They enabled Newton to explain the astronomical observations of Kepler. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, November 1, 2019 at 12:14:46 PM UTC-7, palsing wrote:
On Friday, November 1, 2019 at 12:06:15 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: there must be a mistake somewhere.. 'they' (i don't know who they are) keep listing Gravity as one of the forces of nature... What year did Gravity become a ...force???? When it became a "fundamental interaction" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction 1. Gravity. 2. The weak force. 3. Electromagnetism. 4. The strong force. These are called the four fundamental forces of nature, and they govern everything that happens in the universe. On the other hand... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity ... relativity says otherwise. When not dealing with relativistic speeds, Nertwon's gravitational formulae work just fine. They enabled Newton to explain the astronomical observations of Kepler. When thinking of gravity,and the universe think of me,and my universe equation G=EMC^2.It has made me famous(popular) G is for God or Gravity or both. God is nodding his head.He created all and is telling me how he did it.I always knew why.bert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 11:28:51 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
palsing wrote: On Friday, November 1, 2019 at 12:06:15 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: there must be a mistake somewhere.. 'they' (i don't know who they are) keep listing Gravity as one of the forces of nature... What year did Gravity become a ...force???? When it became a "fundamental interaction" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction 1. Gravity. 2. The weak force. 3. Electromagnetism. 4. The strong force. These are called the four fundamental forces of nature, and they govern everything that happens in the universe. On the other hand... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity ... relativity says otherwise. When not dealing with relativistic speeds, Nertwon's gravitational formulae work just fine. They enabled Newton to explain the astronomical observations of Kepler. The Gravity in a black hole can drag stars, planets, galaxies, space and time in it...how is that a weak force???? dat sounds ****in strong to me... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable. BHs are only real in theory.Keep in mind a weak magnet can lift iron of the ground.bert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unification of all the forces of nature | Herbert Glazier | Misc | 0 | July 12th 19 10:02 PM |
Forces Of Mother Nature | nightbat[_1_] | Misc | 0 | February 17th 07 09:00 AM |
On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces | yinbing-zhou | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 14th 06 08:01 AM |
new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces | yinbing-zhou | Policy | 0 | June 8th 06 08:16 AM |
new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces | yinbing-zhou | Astronomy Misc | 1 | May 25th 06 02:21 AM |