![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Physics teaches that the wavelength of light VARIES with the speed of the emitter:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsVxC_NR64M Stephen Hawking, "A Brief History of Time", Chapter 3: "Now imagine a source of light at a constant distance from us, such as a star, emitting waves of light at a constant wavelength. Obviously the wavelength of the waves we receive will be the same as the wavelength at which they are emitted (the gravitational field of the galaxy will not be large enough to have a significant effect). Suppose now that the source starts moving toward us. When the source emits the next wave crest it will be nearer to us, so the distance between wave crests will be smaller than when the star was stationary." http://www.fisica.net/relatividade/s...ry_of_time.pdf This variation of the wavelength of light contradicts the principle of relativity. If the wavelength varied, by measuring it, Zoe (the emitter) would know how fast she is moving: https://newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/einste...eird_logic.htm Since the wavelength does not vary with Zoe's speed, Jasper measures the speed of light to be c'=c+v, not c: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D0U6R1RXgAEbxnQ.png Future physics will be based on the axiom "The wavelength of light is invariable" Here are five important conclusions validly deducible from this axiom: Premise 1: The wavelength of light is invariable. Premise 2: The formula (frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength) is correct. Conclusion 1: Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a speed-of-light shift. Conclusion 2: If the emitter and the observer (receiver) travel towards each other with relative speed v, the speed of light as measured by the observer is c' = c+v. Conclusion 3: Spacetime is an absurdity. Gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime) don't exist - LIGO conspirators fake them. Conclusion 4: Light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as ordinary falling bodies - near Earth's surface the accelerations of falling photons is g = 9.8 m/s^2. Accordingly, there is no gravitational time dilation - Einstein's general relativity is nonsense. Conclusion 5: The Hubble redshift is due to light slowing down as it travels through vacuum. The universe is STATIC, not expanding. Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Paradigm Shift: Variable Speed of Light, Invariable Wavelength | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 5 | March 9th 19 07:39 AM |
Speed of Light Is Not Invariable ; Wavelength of Light Is | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 30th 18 02:10 PM |
Wavelength, Frequency and Variable Speed of Light | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 8th 16 11:59 PM |
HOW DOES THE SPEED OF LIGHT VARY IN GRAVITY, EINSTEINIANS ? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 3 | August 28th 14 02:50 PM |
ELASTIC WAVELENGTH VERSUS VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 9 | May 3rd 10 08:48 AM |