![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 7:35:05 AM UTC-8, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 15:40:26 -0800 (PST), RichA wrote: https://phys.org/news/2019-01-steam-...y-explore.html Of course, spacecraft that utilize water as their reaction mass have been a staple of science fiction for many decades. And obviously, for certain kinds of travel (as between asteroids or moons) it's a good choice. But reaction mass is only one limiting factor for spacecraft. The other is energy. In the inner system you have solar, which is limitless. But further out you need some other source, presumably nuclear. Most of our nuclear solutions at this point are either relatively low energy (e.g. RTGs) or have relatively short lifetimes of a few years. Still good for many applications, but not quite the "forever" outlined in the above story! (I recall reading that our newest nuclear submarines are powered by a nuclear reactor with something like a 30-year lifetime, no refueling required. I wonder how scalable that technology would be for space operations?) Nuclear power sources are used on the two Voyager spacecraft. Both were launched in 1977 and still producing usable power, although greatly diminished over the years. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GM8 powered by "wall wort"? | Sam Seagate | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | August 24th 15 04:24 PM |
just THREE YEARS AFTER my "CREWLESS Space Shuttle" article, theNSF """experts""" discover the idea of an unmanned Shuttle to fill the2010-2016 cargo-to-ISS (six+ years) GAP | gaetanomarano | Policy | 3 | September 15th 08 04:47 PM |
and now, Ladies and Gentlemen, the NSF "slow motion experts" have(finally) "invented" MY "Multipurpose Orbital Rescue Vehicle"... just 20 | gaetanomarano | Policy | 9 | August 30th 08 12:05 AM |