|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
January 20th 19, 03:31 AM
posted to sci.astro.amateur
|
|||
|
|||
All you need is $100,000 worth of Astro-Physics gear and SBIG/FLI
|
|
#2
January 20th 19, 05:58 AM
posted to sci.astro.amateur
|
|||
|
|||
|
All you need is $100,000 worth of Astro-Physics gear and SBIG/FLI cameras to produce this:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 19:31:52 -0800 (PST), RichA
wrote: http://www.astrosurf.com/luxorion/Do...l-christen.jpg You could get the same at less than a tenth of that cost.
|
|
#3
January 20th 19, 12:23 PM
posted to sci.astro.amateur
|
|||
|
|||
|
All you need is $100,000 worth of Astro-Physics gear and SBIG/FLI
On Saturday, January 19, 2019 at 7:31:54 PM UTC-8, RichA wrote:
http://www.astrosurf.com/luxorion/Do...l-christen.jpg What's that ? Picasso?
|
|
#4
January 20th 19, 12:28 PM
posted to sci.astro.amateur
|
|||
|
|||
|
All you need is $100,000 worth of Astro-Physics gear and SBIG/FLI
On Saturday, January 19, 2019 at 7:31:54 PM UTC-8, RichA wrote:
http://www.astrosurf.com/luxorion/Do...l-christen.jpg Takahasi FSQ106ED http://www.takahashi-europe.com/imag..._u16m_full.jpg
|
|
#5
January 20th 19, 11:23 PM
posted to sci.astro.amateur
|
|||
|
|||
|
All you need is $100,000 worth of Astro-Physics gear and SBIG/FLI
On Sunday, 20 January 2019 07:28:39 UTC-5, StarDust wrote:
On Saturday, January 19, 2019 at 7:31:54 PM UTC-8, RichA wrote: http://www.astrosurf.com/luxorion/Do...l-christen.jpg Takahasi FSQ106ED http://www.takahashi-europe.com/imag..._u16m_full.jpg https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap080719.html
|
|
#6
January 21st 19, 12:55 AM
posted to sci.astro.amateur
|
|||
|
|||
|
All you need is $100,000 worth of Astro-Physics gear and SBIG/FLI
On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 3:23:39 PM UTC-8, RichA wrote:
On Sunday, 20 January 2019 07:28:39 UTC-5, StarDust wrote: On Saturday, January 19, 2019 at 7:31:54 PM UTC-8, RichA wrote: http://www.astrosurf.com/luxorion/Do...l-christen.jpg Takahasi FSQ106ED http://www.takahashi-europe.com/imag..._u16m_full.jpg https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap080719.html I've seen some all some images with the Tac Takahashi FSQ 106ED and a Hutech modded Canon 6D http://www.astrobin.com/full/256526/0/ http://www.astrobin.com/full/256526/0/?real=&mod=
|
|
#7
January 23rd 19, 12:40 AM
posted to sci.astro.amateur
|
|||
|
|||
|
All you need is $100,000 worth of Astro-Physics gear and SBIG/FLI
On Sunday, 20 January 2019 19:55:26 UTC-5, StarDust wrote:
On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 3:23:39 PM UTC-8, RichA wrote: On Sunday, 20 January 2019 07:28:39 UTC-5, StarDust wrote: On Saturday, January 19, 2019 at 7:31:54 PM UTC-8, RichA wrote: http://www.astrosurf.com/luxorion/Do...l-christen.jpg Takahasi FSQ106ED http://www.takahashi-europe.com/imag..._u16m_full.jpg https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap080719.html I've seen some all some images with the Tac Takahashi FSQ 106ED and a Hutech modded Canon 6D http://www.astrobin.com/full/256526/0/ http://www.astrobin.com/full/256526/0/?real=&mod= I've never been a huge fan of wide-field shots, I prefer shots of individual objects. Some widefield shots of things like Orion can be quite spectacular, revealing all the nebulosity we never see with our eyes even using telescopes, but a lot are kind of hazed-out by all the hydrogen gas in an area, which is find when there is structure to it, but not so great when it just looks like haze.
|
|
#8
January 23rd 19, 11:03 AM
posted to sci.astro.amateur
|
|||
|
|||
|
All you need is $100,000 worth of Astro-Physics gear and SBIG/FLI
cameras to produce this:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 16:40:13 -0800 (PST), RichA
wrote: I've never been a huge fan of wide-field shots, I prefer shots of individual objects. Do you consider the Milky Way an individual object? If not, then what about M31?
|
|
#9
January 23rd 19, 11:27 AM
posted to sci.astro.amateur
|
|||
|
|||
|
All you need is $100,000 worth of Astro-Physics gear and SBIG/FLI
On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 6:03:47 AM UTC-5, Paul Schlyter wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 16:40:13 -0800 (PST), RichA wrote: I've never been a huge fan of wide-field shots, I prefer shots of individual objects. Do you consider the Milky Way an individual object? If not, then what about M31? It is understood what Rich meant when he wrote 'individual object,' at least by those whose understand English.
|
|
#10
January 24th 19, 03:26 AM
posted to sci.astro.amateur
|
|||
|
|||
|
All you need is $100,000 worth of Astro-Physics gear and SBIG/FLI
On Wednesday, 23 January 2019 06:03:47 UTC-5, Paul Schlyter wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 16:40:13 -0800 (PST), RichA wrote: I've never been a huge fan of wide-field shots, I prefer shots of individual objects. Do you consider the Milky Way an individual object? If not, then what about M31? Big swath Milky Way shots have never interested me. M31 is an exception to the deepsky rule, they can trace it to over 5 degrees, but not many other objects approach that size.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ASTRO: A note for those using SBIG STL series cameras | Rick Johnson[_2_] | Astro Pictures | 5 | September 18th 07 03:25 PM |
| ASTRO: news from SBIG | Richard Crisp[_1_] | Astro Pictures | 6 | July 4th 07 05:51 PM |
| SBIG 2000XCM -> SBIG 2000XM is this possible? | Pete Milligan | CCD Imaging | 2 | May 5th 05 08:08 AM |
| Astro gear pricing | Doink | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | April 25th 05 01:40 PM |
| Lens Cloths on Astro Gear? | Fleemo | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | August 25th 04 07:18 PM |
Linear Mode
