![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JPL is using an IR filter instead of real red in the RGB mix for it's
photos. So everything so far is not true Martian red. It is altered to bring out features for JPL not the public. People have been fooled so far thinking that Mars landscape is actual color but not intentionally. Later they plan to use the real red filter. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael wrote:
JPL is using an IR filter instead of real red in the RGB mix for it's photos. So everything so far is not true Martian red. It is altered to bring out features for JPL not the public. People have been fooled so far thinking that Mars landscape is actual color but not intentionally. Later they plan to use the real red filter. That's only partially right. The problem with using the IR filter is that it is difficult to reproduce the colors over the entire spectrum; in other words they can get the color of mars right, the color of the sky right, or the blues on the lander right, but they can't get them all right at once. Read that sentence again you skeptics out there because it's the main thing to be understood. There aren't any blues on mars. So it is possible to reproduce the soil with badly calibrated blues. The colors of the images have been approximately correct all along for the Martian landscape because those are the colors they have elected to reproduce faithfully. The sky may be a bit off, and the blues on the lander are way off. But the rocks and soil are close. This image released today should settle this question ounce and for all: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/mer2004/rover-images/jan-30-2004/Spirit_Sol26_med.jpg Note that the color calibration target appears with the proper colors (+/- the response of your display device) with the Martian rocks and soil in the background. I'll say it again: The colors of the images have been approximately correct all along for the Martian landscape because those are the colors they have elected to reproduce faithfully. So for the last time: the soil and rocks are close to the correct colors in all of the images thus far released. -- Greg Crinklaw Astronomical Software Developer Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m) SkyTools Software for the Observer: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html Skyhound Observing Pages: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html To reply remove spleen |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael wrote:
JPL is using an IR filter instead of real red in the RGB mix for it's photos. So everything so far is not true Martian red. It is altered to bring out features for JPL not the public. People have been fooled so far thinking that Mars landscape is actual color but not intentionally. Later they plan to use the real red filter. That's only partially right. The problem with using the IR filter is that it is difficult to reproduce the colors over the entire spectrum; in other words they can get the color of mars right, the color of the sky right, or the blues on the lander right, but they can't get them all right at once. Read that sentence again you skeptics out there because it's the main thing to be understood. There aren't any blues on mars. So it is possible to reproduce the soil with badly calibrated blues. The colors of the images have been approximately correct all along for the Martian landscape because those are the colors they have elected to reproduce faithfully. The sky may be a bit off, and the blues on the lander are way off. But the rocks and soil are close. This image released today should settle this question ounce and for all: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/mer2004/rover-images/jan-30-2004/Spirit_Sol26_med.jpg Note that the color calibration target appears with the proper colors (+/- the response of your display device) with the Martian rocks and soil in the background. I'll say it again: The colors of the images have been approximately correct all along for the Martian landscape because those are the colors they have elected to reproduce faithfully. So for the last time: the soil and rocks are close to the correct colors in all of the images thus far released. -- Greg Crinklaw Astronomical Software Developer Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m) SkyTools Software for the Observer: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html Skyhound Observing Pages: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html To reply remove spleen |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael wrote:
JPL is using an IR filter instead of real red in the RGB mix for it's photos. So everything so far is not true Martian red. It is altered to bring out features for JPL not the public. People have been fooled so far thinking that Mars landscape is actual color but not intentionally. Later they plan to use the real red filter. That's only partially right. The problem with using the IR filter is that it is difficult to reproduce the colors over the entire spectrum; in other words they can get the color of mars right, the color of the sky right, or the blues on the lander right, but they can't get them all right at once. Read that sentence again you skeptics out there because it's the main thing to be understood. There aren't any blues on mars. So it is possible to reproduce the soil with badly calibrated blues. The colors of the images have been approximately correct all along for the Martian landscape because those are the colors they have elected to reproduce faithfully. The sky may be a bit off, and the blues on the lander are way off. But the rocks and soil are close. This image released today should settle this question ounce and for all: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/mer2004/rover-images/jan-30-2004/Spirit_Sol26_med.jpg Note that the color calibration target appears with the proper colors (+/- the response of your display device) with the Martian rocks and soil in the background. I'll say it again: The colors of the images have been approximately correct all along for the Martian landscape because those are the colors they have elected to reproduce faithfully. So for the last time: the soil and rocks are close to the correct colors in all of the images thus far released. -- Greg Crinklaw Astronomical Software Developer Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m) SkyTools Software for the Observer: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html Skyhound Observing Pages: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html To reply remove spleen |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Greg Crinklaw" wrote in message ... Michael wrote: JPL is using an IR filter instead of real red in the RGB mix for it's photos. So everything so far is not true Martian red. It is altered to bring out features for JPL not the public. People have been fooled so far thinking that Mars landscape is actual color but not intentionally. Later they plan to use the real red filter. That's only partially right. The problem with using the IR filter is that it is difficult to reproduce the colors over the entire spectrum; in other words they can get the color of mars right, the color of the sky right, or the blues on the lander right, but they can't get them all right at once. Read that sentence again you skeptics out there because it's the main thing to be understood. There aren't any blues on mars. So it is possible to reproduce the soil with badly calibrated blues. The colors of the images have been approximately correct all along for the Martian landscape because those are the colors they have elected to reproduce faithfully. The sky may be a bit off, and the blues on the lander are way off. But the rocks and soil are close. This image released today should settle this question ounce and for all: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/mer2004/rove...it_Sol26_med.j pg Look, if they can't get the JPL logo right (it's blue, not red) then they are not getting anything right. We "sceptics" as you so idiotically decided to say, want the true colors and they said they will use a true red filter in the future. This was a something I reported afetr watching a report on discovery.ca last night. The colour red is wrong on the Marsdial. So "almost" doesn't cut it either. If I took a 35mm SLR color photo on mars, I would ge the real colours as seen on Mars. This is the real issue. Color as seen on Mars, relative to earth. Who knows, the real color may have a reddish hue all around as filtered through the Mars atmosphere thereby washing out any real colors from the landscape. They should let us decide and just show us instead of low balling us figuring they are "doing the public a favor". |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Greg Crinklaw" wrote in message ... Michael wrote: JPL is using an IR filter instead of real red in the RGB mix for it's photos. So everything so far is not true Martian red. It is altered to bring out features for JPL not the public. People have been fooled so far thinking that Mars landscape is actual color but not intentionally. Later they plan to use the real red filter. That's only partially right. The problem with using the IR filter is that it is difficult to reproduce the colors over the entire spectrum; in other words they can get the color of mars right, the color of the sky right, or the blues on the lander right, but they can't get them all right at once. Read that sentence again you skeptics out there because it's the main thing to be understood. There aren't any blues on mars. So it is possible to reproduce the soil with badly calibrated blues. The colors of the images have been approximately correct all along for the Martian landscape because those are the colors they have elected to reproduce faithfully. The sky may be a bit off, and the blues on the lander are way off. But the rocks and soil are close. This image released today should settle this question ounce and for all: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/mer2004/rove...it_Sol26_med.j pg Look, if they can't get the JPL logo right (it's blue, not red) then they are not getting anything right. We "sceptics" as you so idiotically decided to say, want the true colors and they said they will use a true red filter in the future. This was a something I reported afetr watching a report on discovery.ca last night. The colour red is wrong on the Marsdial. So "almost" doesn't cut it either. If I took a 35mm SLR color photo on mars, I would ge the real colours as seen on Mars. This is the real issue. Color as seen on Mars, relative to earth. Who knows, the real color may have a reddish hue all around as filtered through the Mars atmosphere thereby washing out any real colors from the landscape. They should let us decide and just show us instead of low balling us figuring they are "doing the public a favor". |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Greg Crinklaw" wrote in message ... Michael wrote: JPL is using an IR filter instead of real red in the RGB mix for it's photos. So everything so far is not true Martian red. It is altered to bring out features for JPL not the public. People have been fooled so far thinking that Mars landscape is actual color but not intentionally. Later they plan to use the real red filter. That's only partially right. The problem with using the IR filter is that it is difficult to reproduce the colors over the entire spectrum; in other words they can get the color of mars right, the color of the sky right, or the blues on the lander right, but they can't get them all right at once. Read that sentence again you skeptics out there because it's the main thing to be understood. There aren't any blues on mars. So it is possible to reproduce the soil with badly calibrated blues. The colors of the images have been approximately correct all along for the Martian landscape because those are the colors they have elected to reproduce faithfully. The sky may be a bit off, and the blues on the lander are way off. But the rocks and soil are close. This image released today should settle this question ounce and for all: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/mer2004/rove...it_Sol26_med.j pg Look, if they can't get the JPL logo right (it's blue, not red) then they are not getting anything right. We "sceptics" as you so idiotically decided to say, want the true colors and they said they will use a true red filter in the future. This was a something I reported afetr watching a report on discovery.ca last night. The colour red is wrong on the Marsdial. So "almost" doesn't cut it either. If I took a 35mm SLR color photo on mars, I would ge the real colours as seen on Mars. This is the real issue. Color as seen on Mars, relative to earth. Who knows, the real color may have a reddish hue all around as filtered through the Mars atmosphere thereby washing out any real colors from the landscape. They should let us decide and just show us instead of low balling us figuring they are "doing the public a favor". |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg Crinklaw wrote:
So for the last time: the soil and rocks are close to the correct colors in all of the images thus far released. If only our CRTs, LCD, TFT monitors and printers were so carefully calibrated! And don't even start on TVs. My laptop is so bad I only do graphics work on it when I have no other choice. It's kind of funny to look around any room with multiple TV-like devices all showing the same picture and see how different they are. It was even true of the TV monitors in the Von Karmann auditorium at JPL when I was there on Spirit landing night. Mojo -- Morris Jones * Monrovia, CA http://www.whiteoaks.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg Crinklaw wrote:
So for the last time: the soil and rocks are close to the correct colors in all of the images thus far released. If only our CRTs, LCD, TFT monitors and printers were so carefully calibrated! And don't even start on TVs. My laptop is so bad I only do graphics work on it when I have no other choice. It's kind of funny to look around any room with multiple TV-like devices all showing the same picture and see how different they are. It was even true of the TV monitors in the Von Karmann auditorium at JPL when I was there on Spirit landing night. Mojo -- Morris Jones * Monrovia, CA http://www.whiteoaks.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg Crinklaw wrote:
So for the last time: the soil and rocks are close to the correct colors in all of the images thus far released. If only our CRTs, LCD, TFT monitors and printers were so carefully calibrated! And don't even start on TVs. My laptop is so bad I only do graphics work on it when I have no other choice. It's kind of funny to look around any room with multiple TV-like devices all showing the same picture and see how different they are. It was even true of the TV monitors in the Von Karmann auditorium at JPL when I was there on Spirit landing night. Mojo -- Morris Jones * Monrovia, CA http://www.whiteoaks.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
Mars Colors | Bob Webster | Astronomy Misc | 5 | May 18th 04 11:58 AM |
Sound transmission from Mars? | Wizard of Ozz | Amateur Astronomy | 183 | February 2nd 04 08:24 PM |
Bands of Saturn. How many of them can be counted (really!) with 7" scope? | ValeryD | Amateur Astronomy | 294 | January 26th 04 08:18 PM |
Colors of mars | Raoul | Technology | 6 | January 16th 04 08:49 AM |