![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() https://www.nasa.gov/mars2020 https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=7121 Mars 2020 's rover is as heavy as a small car, maybe it'll be escorted by a small exploration helicopter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 4:24:10 AM UTC-7, Sylvain wrote:
https://www.nasa.gov/mars2020 https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=7121 Mars 2020 's rover is as heavy as a small car, maybe it'll be escorted by a small exploration helicopter No oxygen in the atmosphere to help it burn fuel. I think a balloon would have been much more efficient. Double-A |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Le 12/05/2018 Ã* 22:33, Double-A a écritÂ*:
On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 4:24:10 AM UTC-7, Sylvain wrote: https://www.nasa.gov/mars2020 https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=7121 Mars 2020 's rover is as heavy as a small car, maybe it'll be escorted by a small exploration helicopter No oxygen in the atmosphere to help it burn fuel. I think a balloon would have been much more efficient. Double-A I think the choice of helicopter was made because the helicopter's moves are controllabler and quicker Accept a ballon: to move it as you want, it would take a rover with a string which holds the balloon, but the rover is very slow, and the string's mass limits the height Mars 2020's helicopter can fly three minuts and to charge itself by a solar panel. It can go up to 400 meters hight helicopter use will for locating rover's way and find interesting places |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 3:45:13 PM UTC-7, Sylvain wrote:
Le 12/05/2018 Ã* 22:33, Double-A a écritÂ*: On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 4:24:10 AM UTC-7, Sylvain wrote: https://www.nasa.gov/mars2020 https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=7121 Mars 2020 's rover is as heavy as a small car, maybe it'll be escorted by a small exploration helicopter No oxygen in the atmosphere to help it burn fuel. I think a balloon would have been much more efficient. Double-A I think the choice of helicopter was made because the helicopter's moves are controllabler and quicker Accept a ballon: to move it as you want, it would take a rover with a string which holds the balloon, but the rover is very slow, and the string's mass limits the height Mars 2020's helicopter can fly three minuts and to charge itself by a solar panel. It can go up to 400 meters hight helicopter use will for locating rover's way and find interesting places A balloon is a lot cheaper.I would go with 6 balloons all different sizes.Mars has little air pressure(1% of Earth's)I like water balloons too.(ice balls) Time to probe down as far as we can,or use explosives.Make a deep hole in the deepest crater.Hope to find Mars mud.Bert |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 11:37:54 AM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 3:45:13 PM UTC-7, Sylvain wrote: Le 12/05/2018 Ã* 22:33, Double-A a écritÂ*: On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 4:24:10 AM UTC-7, Sylvain wrote: https://www.nasa.gov/mars2020 https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=7121 Mars 2020 's rover is as heavy as a small car, maybe it'll be escorted by a small exploration helicopter No oxygen in the atmosphere to help it burn fuel. I think a balloon would have been much more efficient. Double-A I think the choice of helicopter was made because the helicopter's moves are controllabler and quicker Accept a ballon: to move it as you want, it would take a rover with a string which holds the balloon, but the rover is very slow, and the string's mass limits the height Mars 2020's helicopter can fly three minuts and to charge itself by a solar panel. It can go up to 400 meters hight helicopter use will for locating rover's way and find interesting places A balloon is a lot cheaper.I would go with 6 balloons all different sizes..Mars has little air pressure(1% of Earth's)I like water balloons too.(ice balls) Time to probe down as far as we can,or use explosives.Make a deep hole in the deepest crater.Hope to find Mars mud.Bert Of course NASA will use the most expensive way to do things. After all, the taxpayer's paying for it! Double-A |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bert's posted crap goes on and on
and shows why Bert is a moron ------- See: Glazier's Dossier ------- e.g. http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-REAL-intent |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 12:35:38 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 11:37:54 AM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote: On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 3:45:13 PM UTC-7, Sylvain wrote: Le 12/05/2018 Ã* 22:33, Double-A a écritÂ*: On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 4:24:10 AM UTC-7, Sylvain wrote: https://www.nasa.gov/mars2020 https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=7121 Mars 2020 's rover is as heavy as a small car, maybe it'll be escorted by a small exploration helicopter No oxygen in the atmosphere to help it burn fuel. I think a balloon would have been much more efficient. Double-A I think the choice of helicopter was made because the helicopter's moves are controllabler and quicker Accept a ballon: to move it as you want, it would take a rover with a string which holds the balloon, but the rover is very slow, and the string's mass limits the height Mars 2020's helicopter can fly three minuts and to charge itself by a solar panel. It can go up to 400 meters hight helicopter use will for locating rover's way and find interesting places A balloon is a lot cheaper.I would go with 6 balloons all different sizes.Mars has little air pressure(1% of Earth's)I like water balloons too.(ice balls) Time to probe down as far as we can,or use explosives.Make a deep hole in the deepest crater.Hope to find Mars mud.Bert Of course NASA will use the most expensive way to do things. After all, the taxpayer's paying for it! Double-A The more NASA spends the more GOPer Mafia can steal.Nixon,Annenberg.Kissenger stole 2 billion for 43 years of shuTTLES.Bush made them look like pikers..Bert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bert thinks that his Q&A do have wit (LOL)
Fact is that Bert posts only **** ------ See: Glazier's Dossier ------- e.g. http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-REAL-intent |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 11:37:54 AM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 3:45:13 PM UTC-7, Sylvain wrote: Le 12/05/2018 Ã* 22:33, Double-A a écritÂ*: On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 4:24:10 AM UTC-7, Sylvain wrote: https://www.nasa.gov/mars2020 https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=7121 Mars 2020 's rover is as heavy as a small car, maybe it'll be escorted by a small exploration helicopter No oxygen in the atmosphere to help it burn fuel. I think a balloon would have been much more efficient. Double-A I think the choice of helicopter was made because the helicopter's moves are controllabler and quicker Accept a ballon: to move it as you want, it would take a rover with a string which holds the balloon, but the rover is very slow, and the string's mass limits the height Mars 2020's helicopter can fly three minuts and to charge itself by a solar panel. It can go up to 400 meters hight helicopter use will for locating rover's way and find interesting places A balloon is a lot cheaper.I would go with 6 balloons all different sizes..Mars has little air pressure(1% of Earth's)I like water balloons too.(ice balls) Time to probe down as far as we can,or use explosives.Make a deep hole in the deepest crater.Hope to find Mars mud.Bert Every Mars rover has to have 6 big red balloons.Why not.They would show the wind directin.Density of air etc.All for little $$$$ Even a water balloon Bert |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 12:35:38 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 11:37:54 AM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote: On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 3:45:13 PM UTC-7, Sylvain wrote: Le 12/05/2018 Ã* 22:33, Double-A a écritÂ*: On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 4:24:10 AM UTC-7, Sylvain wrote: https://www.nasa.gov/mars2020 https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=7121 Mars 2020 's rover is as heavy as a small car, maybe it'll be escorted by a small exploration helicopter No oxygen in the atmosphere to help it burn fuel. I think a balloon would have been much more efficient. Double-A I think the choice of helicopter was made because the helicopter's moves are controllabler and quicker Accept a ballon: to move it as you want, it would take a rover with a string which holds the balloon, but the rover is very slow, and the string's mass limits the height Mars 2020's helicopter can fly three minuts and to charge itself by a solar panel. It can go up to 400 meters hight helicopter use will for locating rover's way and find interesting places A balloon is a lot cheaper.I would go with 6 balloons all different sizes.Mars has little air pressure(1% of Earth's)I like water balloons too.(ice balls) Time to probe down as far as we can,or use explosives.Make a deep hole in the deepest crater.Hope to find Mars mud.Bert Of course NASA will use the most expensive way to do things. After all, the taxpayer's paying for it! Double-A More spent the more it can steal.GOP stole 2 billion for 43 years.This made Walter Annenberg the richest man in the world.I wonder who he left his 85 billion too? Any mention of him in Google" The Godfather might not let them use his name in vain. His estate was protected by all USA police.Army airforce too.Bert |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mars 2020 Rover to Search for Life | Jonathan | Policy | 5 | August 23rd 16 10:30 PM |
Mars by 2020, speculation | M | History | 5 | December 16th 08 12:14 AM |
NASA on mars 2020 animation | Jan Panteltje | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 24th 07 06:34 PM |
FWD: [marssocietynewsletter] Gorshkov: Russian manned Mission to Mars by 2020 is Feasible | Space Cadet | Policy | 11 | May 16th 06 07:49 PM |
Mars' Atmosphere | Jase | Astronomy Misc | 24 | January 18th 04 01:18 AM |