Detection of neutron star gravitational waves is far more likely than detection of black hole gravitational waves and yet LIGO conspirators haven't reported even weak and inconclusive signals (which could be compared with Integral's data and become valid evidence in the end). The reason is that faking black hole waves is safe and profitable while faking neutron star waves is dangerous - mergers of neutron stars emit light which means that Integral may expose the fraud. So Einsteiniana's brainwashers don't mention neutron stars anymore and advance a red herring - the gullible world will have to wait for 15 years to know whether black hole mergers emit light or not:
Ethan Siegel: "In the aftermath of the first LIGO detection, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor made headlines as they claimed to detect a high energy burst of radiation coincident within a second of the gravitational wave signal. Unfortunately, ESA's Integral satellite not only failed to confirm Fermi's results, but scientists working there uncovered a flaw in Fermi's analysis of their data, completely discrediting their results. [...] Also, everything we see is perfectly consistent — and arguably, more consistent — with the notion that merging black holes don't have any electromagnetic counterparts at all. But the truth about it all is that we don't have sufficient data to decide just yet. With more gravitational wave detectors, more black hole mergers of high masses, better pinpointing of the location, and better all-sky coverage of transient events, we just might find out the answer to this. If the missions and observatories proposed to collect this data are successfully built, operated, and (where necessary) launched, then 15 years from now, we can expect to actually know the scientific answer for certain."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/startsw...es-emit-light/
Ethan Siegel:
http://scienceblogs.com/startswithab...s-600x1282.jpg
Pentcho Valev