![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Premise: "If we accept the principle of equivalence, we must also accept that light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as material bodies." http://sethi.lamar.edu/bahrim-cristi...t-lens_PPT.pdf
Conclusion: Gravitational time dilation does not exist - the gravitational redshift is caused by the variation of the speed of light predicted by Newton's emission theory of light: https://courses.physics.illinois.edu...e13/L13r..html University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: "Consider a falling object. ITS SPEED INCREASES AS IT IS FALLING. Hence, if we were to associate a frequency with that object the frequency should increase accordingly as it falls to earth. Because of the equivalence between gravitational and inertial mass, WE SHOULD OBSERVE THE SAME EFFECT FOR LIGHT. So lets shine a light beam from the top of a very tall building. If we can measure the frequency shift as the light beam descends the building, we should be able to discern how gravity affects a falling light beam. This was done by Pound and Rebka in 1960. They shone a light from the top of the Jefferson tower at Harvard and measured the frequency shift. The frequency shift was tiny but in agreement with the theoretical prediction. Consider a light beam that is travelling away from a gravitational field. Its frequency should shift to lower values.. This is known as the gravitational red shift of light." http://www.einstein-online.info/spot...t_white_dwarfs Albert Einstein Institute: "One of the three classical tests for general relativity is the gravitational redshift of light or other forms of electromagnetic radiation. However, in contrast to the other two tests - the gravitational deflection of light and the relativistic perihelion shift -, you do not need general relativity to derive the correct prediction for the gravitational redshift. A combination of Newtonian gravity, a particle theory of light, and the weak equivalence principle (gravitating mass equals inertial mass) suffices. [...] The gravitational redshift was first measured on earth in 1960-65 by Pound, Rebka, and Snider at Harvard University..." Pound, Rebka and Snider knew that their experiments had confirmed the variation of the speed of light predicted by Newton's emission theory of light, not the gravitational time dilation predicted by Einstein's relativity: http://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1...sRevLett.4.337 R. V. Pound and G. A. Rebka, Jr, APPARENT WEIGHT OF PHOTONS http://virgo.lal.in2p3.fr/NPAC/relat...iers/pound.pdf R. V. Pound and J. L. Snider, Effect of Gravity on Gamma Radiation: "It is not our purpose here to enter into the many-sided discussion of the relationship between the effect under study and general relativity or energy conservation. It is to be noted that no strictly relativistic concepts are involved and the description of the effect as an "apparent weight" of photons is suggestive. The velocity difference predicted is identical to that which a material object would acquire in free fall for a time equal to the time of flight." Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How the Pound-Rebka Experiment Disproves Einstein's Relativity | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 3 | February 18th 17 10:22 PM |
LOGIC IN THE POUND-REBKA EXPERIMENT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | May 1st 15 07:52 AM |
POUND-REBKA EXPERIMENT : ALL POSSIBILITIES | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | June 1st 14 11:45 AM |
Interpreting the Pound-Rebka experiment in 1911 | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 8 | February 4th 09 08:23 PM |
RELATIVITY HYPNOTISTS EXPLAIN THE POUND AND REBKA EXPERIMENT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 29 | May 21st 07 09:24 PM |