![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I recall reading one time that since refractors effectively spread out the light spectrum, the shorter the focal length, the greater the spread. A formula was given that to keep the effective "spread" from becoming too great (more than one wave of light), the focal length had to be three times the diameter of the objective as measured in inches times the diameter of the objective. Thus, a refractor with a focal length of three inches (76.2mm) needed to be 3x3 or F9. Or 27 inches (686mm) in order to hold the spread of the light spectrum below one wave. How accurate is this? Anyone know more? Jerome Bigge Member, Muskegon Astronomical Society Author of the "Warlady" & "Wartime" series. Download at "http://members.tripod.com/~jbigge" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hans Moravec's Original Rotovator Paper | James Bowery | Policy | 0 | July 6th 04 07:45 AM |
Any good Refractor focal length 200-250mm for ToUcam Pro? | Chotechai | Amateur Astronomy | 9 | January 23rd 04 07:55 PM |
Your opinions, please... | LarryG | Amateur Astronomy | 23 | July 28th 03 04:30 AM |
Short versus Long Stowaway | Rich N. | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | July 13th 03 08:21 PM |