![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Einstein's original formulation of the constant-speed-of-light postulate:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ Albert Einstein, ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES, 1905: "...light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body." This independence of the state of motion of the emitting body is only conceivable if the emitting body is able to change the wavelength of the emitted light. For instance, when the emitting body starts moving towards the observer, the wavelength of the emitted light must become shorter (otherwise Einstein's light postulate is false). Accordingly, Einsteinians fiercely teach that, for all kinds of waves (light waves included), the wavefronts bunch up (the wavelength decreases) in front of a wave source which starts moving towards the observer: http://www.einstein-online.info/imag...ler_static.gif (stationary source) http://www.einstein-online.info/imag...ource_blue.gif (moving source) http://www.fisica.net/relatividade/s...ry_of_time.pdf Stephen Hawking, "A Brief History of Time", Chapter 3: "Now imagine a source of light at a constant distance from us, such as a star, emitting waves of light at a constant wavelength. Obviously the wavelength of the waves we receive will be the same as the wavelength at which they are emitted (the gravitational field of the galaxy will not be large enough to have a significant effect). Suppose now that the source starts moving toward us. When the source emits the next wave crest it will be nearer to us, so the distance between wave crests will be smaller than when the star was stationary." For waves other than light waves the moving source does indeed emit shorter wavelength, and the reason is that the speed of the waves relative to the source decreases when the source starts moving. This shortening of the wavelength is measurable in the frame of the source - the wavelength is measured to be λ when the source is stationary, and then it is measured to be λ' (λλ') when the source is moving. For light waves this is obviously not the case - the speed of the light relative to the source does not change when the source starts moving. In the frame of the source the wavelength is measured to be λ when the source is stationary, and then it is measured to be λ again when the source is moving, which means that the wavefronts DO NOT BUNCH UP in front of the moving source. Conclusion: The moving light source does not emit shorter wavelength. Rather, it emits faster light. If the initially stationary source starts moving towards the stationary observer with speed v, the speed of the light relative to the observer shifts from c to c'=c+v, as predicted by Newton's emission theory of light and in violation of Einstein's relativity. Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSYCHOLOGY OF THE DOPPLER EFFECT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 6 | November 28th 12 10:44 AM |
DOPPLER EFFECT AND CRIMESTOP | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 19th 12 11:10 PM |
DOPPLER EFFECT AND CRIMESTOP | Tonico | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 31st 12 03:13 PM |
Annular Doppler effect | Szczepan Bialek | History | 0 | November 5th 11 06:02 PM |