Make America great again!!! )o:

Bush, Make America great again!
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/q2ueeXbdOHE/maxresdefault.jpg

Trump, Make America great again!
http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/a...82_496898a.jpg

On Monday, December 12, 2016 at 4:39:52 AM UTC-5, StarDust wrote:
Bush, Make America great again!
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/q2ueeXbdOHE/maxresdefault.jpg

Lame.

Trump, Make America great again!
http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/a...82_496898a.jpg

Lamer still.

On Tuesday, 13 December 2016 06:34:02 UTC+1, wrote:

Here's the Scrumpy version imitating his wife's early career:

http://jamesparce.deviantart.com/art...ored-502914708

Being rather judgemental, aren't you?

Do you not find female models attractive?

Just for once I'll respond since you ask an interesting question which should be discussed on its merit:

One's personal "assets" are like a winning, or losing, genetic lottery ticket. Inherited from one's family 'stock' one has absolutely no control over a winning or losing "ticket." WYSIWYG. Facial plastic surgery may help. Plastic surgery for brains, lungs or a great voice are somewhere in the future..

Why is it that a woman who uses her winning ticket of brains is considered a successful woman? She is, after all, merely making the best of her genetic lottery win of intellectual advantage or superiority. She may become a great scientist, engineer, teacher, writer or lawyer. Or something else altogether. One might even say that she is exercising her winning ticket to be most like a successful man? Is this why she has the highest approval rating from feminists?

Yet, when a woman maximizes her genetic lottery win of advantages in having an acceptable face and figure _for her own time_ she is instantly considered inferior to the woman with brains. She may become a model, a pop star, a spy, a trophy bride, an upmarket escort, a politician or an actress. Or all of the above.

Each 'career' has its admirers and detractors. Who can really say how each should be ranked? A beautiful woman has one very distinct advantage over her losing inferiors: She is often surrounded and encouraged by smiling men for most of her life. Those without her obvious assets are usually invisible and receive no such repeated auto-encouragement.

A third woman inherited a great voice, talent, patience and lungs and becomes a great opera star. Only a very small minority of people actually enjoy opera. Yet this woman is considered a great success and is feted around the world. If she is twice lucky and has appearance _and_ a great voice she is even more famous and enjoys even greater approval. Somehow the beauty is allowed to be cancelled out by feminists because the "great singer" has other and "better" talents?

Perhaps we should blame women themselves: Feminists, in particular, who used their own losing lottery ticket to become a critic of specific women who do not meet their narrow-minded approval. They "took it upon themselves" to make particular types of women appear inferior. Simply because of their life choices taken with their genetic lottery of winning or losing tickets.

Are there any beautiful, intellectual feminists who can sing, run or dance? Or did they all inherit the stereotypical sour, lumpy, dumpy, bespectacled imitations of cruel and demonic bile towards certain members of their own sex? Are feminists merely usurping the duties of witch finder general? All women with "great looks" must be evil and guilty by default? It's just not fair?

Cue snelly's default, argumentative response:

On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 1:17:18 PM UTC-5, Chris.B wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 December 2016 06:34:02 UTC+1, wrote:

Here's the Scrumpy version imitating his wife's early career:

http://jamesparce.deviantart.com/art...ored-502914708

Being rather judgemental, aren't you?

Do you not find female models attractive?

Just for once I'll respond since you ask an interesting question which should be discussed on its merit:

meandering rant deleted

You failed to answer a simple yes/no question.

On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 10:59:42 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 1:17:18 PM UTC-5, Chris.B wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 December 2016 06:34:02 UTC+1, wrote:

Here's the Scrumpy version imitating his wife's early career:

http://jamesparce.deviantart.com/art...ored-502914708

Being rather judgemental, aren't you?

Do you not find female models attractive?

Just for once I'll respond since you ask an interesting question which should be discussed on its merit:

meandering rant deleted

You failed to answer a simple yes/no question.

And you failed to respond to an intelligent analysis that can't be
reduced to a simple yes or no. Of course, for you, everything is
binary.

On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 2:04:21 PM UTC-5, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 10:59:42 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 1:17:18 PM UTC-5, Chris.B wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 December 2016 06:34:02 UTC+1, wrote:

Here's the Scrumpy version imitating his wife's early career:

http://jamesparce.deviantart.com/art...ored-502914708

Being rather judgemental, aren't you?

Do you not find female models attractive?

Just for once I'll respond since you ask an interesting question which should be discussed on its merit:

meandering rant deleted

You failed to answer a simple yes/no question.

And you failed to respond to an intelligent analysis

There was no "analysis," intelligent or otherwise.

that can't be
reduced to a simple yes or no. Of course, for you, everything is
binary.

What do YOU have against Trump's wife, peterson?

(That's not a yes/no question, BTW.)

On Wednesday, 14 December 2016 19:59:43 UTC+1, wrote:

meandering rant deleted

You failed to answer a simple yes/no question.

English comprehension not your strong point? A. Y/N.
Or do you have the attention span of a gnat? A. Y/N

Only a fool couches open questions in the expectation of a Yes/No response.
You did not stipulate a Yes/No response.
So why would such an answer be appropriate?
Perhaps you actually expected a mind reader's response? A. Y/N

Are you a cowardly, wife-beating throwback to the stone-age with severe anger control issues and a court record? A. Y/N.

On Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 7:19:13 AM UTC-5, Chris.B wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 December 2016 19:59:43 UTC+1, wrote:

meandering rant deleted

You failed to answer a simple yes/no question.

English comprehension not your strong point? A. Y/N.
Or do you have the attention span of a gnat? A. Y/N

Only a fool couches open questions in the expectation of a Yes/No response.
You did not stipulate a Yes/No response.
So why would such an answer be appropriate?
Perhaps you actually expected a mind reader's response? A. Y/N

Are you a cowardly, wife-beating throwback to the stone-age with severe anger control issues and a court record? A. Y/N.

You are repeating peterson's libel, and do keep in mind that Denmark's laws might be a bit more draconian that those of the US.

Now, do you actually find female models to be attractive? Either you do or you don't.

On Thursday, 15 December 2016 13:47:56 UTC+1, wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 7:19:13 AM UTC-5, Chris.B wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 December 2016 19:59:43 UTC+1, wrote:

meandering rant deleted

You failed to answer a simple yes/no question.

English comprehension not your strong point? A. Y/N.
Or do you have the attention span of a gnat? A. Y/N

Only a fool couches open questions in the expectation of a Yes/No response.
You did not stipulate a Yes/No response.
So why would such an answer be appropriate?
Perhaps you actually expected a mind reader's response? A. Y/N

Are you a cowardly, wife-beating throwback to the stone-age with severe anger control issues and a court record? A. Y/N.

You are repeating peterson's libel, and do keep in mind that Denmark's laws might be a bit more draconian that those of the US.

Now, do you actually find female models to be attractive? Either you do or you don't.

Dear Dullard Fascist-Troll Jr.

I asked a simple question. Asking a question is not libel.

Are you a cowardly, wife-beating throwback to the stone-age with severe anger control issues and a court record? A. Y/N.

On Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 8:33:25 AM UTC-5, Chris.B wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 13:47:56 UTC+1, wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 7:19:13 AM UTC-5, Chris.B wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 December 2016 19:59:43 UTC+1, wrote:

meandering rant deleted

You failed to answer a simple yes/no question.

English comprehension not your strong point? A. Y/N.
Or do you have the attention span of a gnat? A. Y/N

Only a fool couches open questions in the expectation of a Yes/No response.
You did not stipulate a Yes/No response.
So why would such an answer be appropriate?
Perhaps you actually expected a mind reader's response? A. Y/N

Are you a cowardly, wife-beating throwback to the stone-age with severe anger control issues and a court record? A. Y/N.

You are repeating peterson's libel, and do keep in mind that Denmark's laws might be a bit more draconian that those of the US.

Now, do you actually find female models to be attractive? Either you do or you don't.

Dear Dullard Fascist-Troll Jr.

I asked a simple question. Asking a question is not libel.

Are you a cowardly, wife-beating throwback to the stone-age with severe anger control issues and a court record? A. Y/N.

That is a repetition of peterson's libel.

You are the one making fun of Trump's wife. Now answer the question YOU were asked.