The relativity of the sky that we see...

(..now probabely our Einstein is looking to another side .. and so i can speak with you sincerly..)
....we see the sky.. with stars and galaxies ... there ..so far and bright .... moment ! ... there , but not much there ... because the negative parallaxes are the 49%...
: a negative parallax is an inexisting thing .. : if you look for an object and you move to the right side you begin to form a positive angle from your starting position and the last position ...but the object can move ( at 100 times the light 'speed ?) or something in the travel'path can deviate the light .. so the angle that you imagined to measure positive , began negative ... : you move to the right but the observed object is like you moved to the link side ! ..all can happen , but the logics must exists ...
: if you look for a near star , untill 100 yers light , the parallaxes are almost all positive ; after 500 y.l. we have many negative-ones untill a percentege of 49%... the dwarf stars are observable untill 200-300 y.l. .. and its seem to have only the 10% of deviation !
So the positive and negative parallaxes have the same probability to exist for not near stars and all it seems deviated ... and almost nothing is where we look , with all the consequence of the case .. the case that they seem to not want that it is so ....
Untill the year 2000 the negative parallaxes are not suspected ...then the HST'datas came ..and they don't want it is true (?), because that concerns too nearly from the dark matter to the universe ' age (1000 times older ?)... and ..and .. the CDS Strasbourg edited about that three catalogues : with all negative parallaxes (49)%! , with 20% neg.! and a reduced and almost normal (?) body !... 15 years ago i asked them :'Why so many negative-ones?'.. :'Hee, hee ..some error..and some intermediate body ..' .. good luck in the hunt !