![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 53:28 in this video Joao Magueijo declares allegiance to the Newtonian space and time:
http://pirsa.org/displayFlash.php?id=16060116 FUNDAMENTAL TIME, Wednesday Jun 29, 2016, Speaker(s): Laurent Freidel, Lee Smolin, Joao Magueijo, 53:28 Here is another striking statement: http://www.amazon.com/Faster-Than-Sp.../dp/0738205257 Joao Magueijo, Faster Than the Speed of Light, p. 250: "Lee [Smolin] and I discussed these paradoxes at great length for many months, starting in January 2001. We would meet in cafés in South Kensington or Holland Park to mull over the problem. THE ROOT OF ALL THE EVIL WAS CLEARLY SPECIAL RELATIVITY. All these paradoxes resulted from well known effects such as length contraction, time dilation, or E=mc^2, all basic predictions of special relativity. And all denied the possibility of establishing a well-defined border, common to all observers, capable of containing new quantum gravitational effects." Is Magueijo a Newtonian who teaches relativity just for money? Judging from the following texts, Lee Smolin is a Newtonian as well: http://www.fqxi.org/community/articles/display/148 "Many physicists argue that time is an illusion. Lee Smolin begs to differ.. [...] Smolin wishes to hold on to the reality of time. But to do so, he must overcome a major hurdle: General and special relativity seem to imply the opposite. In the classical Newtonian view, physics operated according to the ticking of an invisible universal clock. But Einstein threw out that master clock when, in his theory of special relativity, he argued that no two events are truly simultaneous unless they are causally related. If simultaneity - the notion of "now" - is relative, the universal clock must be a fiction, and time itself a proxy for the movement and change of objects in the universe. Time is literally written out of the equation. Although he has spent much of his career exploring the facets of a "timeless" universe, Smolin has become convinced that this is "deeply wrong," he says. He now believes that time is more than just a useful approximation, that it is as real as our guts tell us it is - more real, in fact, than space itself. The notion of a "real and global time" is the starting hypothesis for Smolin's new work, which he will undertake this year with two graduate students supported by a $47,500 grant from FQXi." http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013...reality-review "And by making the clock's tick relative - what happens simultaneously for one observer might seem sequential to another - Einstein's theory of special relativity not only destroyed any notion of absolute time but made time equivalent to a dimension in space: the future is already out there waiting for us; we just can't see it until we get there. This view is a logical and metaphysical dead end, says Smolin." http://www.bookdepository.com/Time-R.../9780547511726 "Was Einstein wrong? At least in his understanding of time, Smolin argues, the great theorist of relativity was dead wrong. What is worse, by firmly enshrining his error in scientific orthodoxy, Einstein trapped his successors in insoluble dilemmas..." Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Quality of Orion Optics Newtonians | Chris | UK Astronomy | 10 | August 24th 05 04:56 PM |
ClearAperture, Off Axiis Objective, Newtonians. | Bill Kelly | UK Astronomy | 3 | March 1st 05 10:59 PM |
Are Newtonians Good for Widefield CCD Imaging? | Glen Baker | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | September 9th 04 01:56 AM |
Why do we not see more fast newtonians doing imaging? | Rich McMahon | Amateur Astronomy | 168 | January 20th 04 06:34 PM |
So how are the Chinese Newtonians? | Richard | Amateur Astronomy | 33 | January 8th 04 01:09 PM |