![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Yousuf Khan writes: The first event seemed to happen quicker, while the second one seems more drawn out. I wonder if this tells us something about the masses of the two new blackholes? Specifically will the fact that it happened much slower for the second set of black holes, would that mean that they were smaller black holes than the first set from the September detection/February announcement? Yes. See item 2 in the press release at https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/news/ligo20160615 -- Help keep our newsgroup healthy; please don't feed the trolls. Steve Willner Phone 617-495-7123 Cambridge, MA 02138 USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Second Gravitational Wave likely detected | Yousuf Khan[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 15th 16 01:21 AM |
Gravitational wave data... | dlzc | Astronomy Misc | 2 | February 17th 16 03:57 PM |
1908 Tunguska Event confirmed as comet | Thad Floryan | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | July 22nd 09 07:49 AM |
A convenient Gravitational Wave Detector? | Robert Karl Stonjek | Astronomy Misc | 7 | January 22nd 08 10:46 PM |
Article: Gravitational Wave Background | Robert Karl Stonjek | Astronomy Misc | 10 | February 7th 07 12:09 PM |