![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Einstein postulated that the speed of light is constant (independent of the motion of the light source) because he very much wanted his theory to be a field theory:
http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/companion.pdf John Norton: "Einstein could not see how to formulate a fully relativistic electrodynamics merely using his new device of field transformations. So he considered the possibility of modifying Maxwell's electrodynamics in order to bring it into accord with an emission theory of light, such as Newton had originally conceived. There was some inevitability in these attempts, as long as he held to classical (Galilean) kinematics. Imagine that some emitter sends out a light beam at c. According to this kinematics, an observer who moves past at v in the opposite direction, will see the emitter moving at v and the light emitted at c+v. This last fact is the defining characteristic of an emission theory of light: the velocity of the emitter is added vectorially to the velocity of light emitted. (...) If an emission theory can be formulated as a field theory, it would seem to be unable to determine the future course of processes from their state in the present. As long as Einstein expected a viable theory of light, electricity and magnetism to be a field theory, these sorts of objections would render an emission theory of light inadmissible." http://www.worldscientific.com/world...s/10.1142/6019 Frank Wilczek, Fantastic Realities, p. 294: "One of the most basic results of special relativity, that the speed of light is a limiting velocity for the propagation of any physical influence, makes the field concept almost inevitable." http://www.relativitybook.com/resour...ein_space.html Albert Einstein (1952): "In accordance with the historical development of the field concept, where no matter was available there could also exist no field. But in the first quarter of the nineteenth century it was shown that the phenomena of the interference and motion of light could be explained with astonishing clearness when light was regarded as a wave-field, completely analogous to the mechanical vibration field in an elastic solid body. It was thus felt necessary to introduce a field, that could also exist in "empty space" in the absence of ponderable matter. (...) Since the special theory of relativity revealed the physical equivalence of all inertial systems, it proved the untenability of the hypothesis of an aether at rest. It was therefore necessary to renounce the idea that the electromagnetic field is to be regarded as a state of a material carrier. The field thus becomes an irreducible element of physical description, irreducible in the same sense as the concept of matter in the theory of Newton." However in 1954 Einstein made the following confession: http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/pdf...09145525ca.pdf Albert Einstein (1954): "I consider it entirely possible that physics cannot be based upon the field concept, that is on continuous structures. Then nothing will remain of my whole castle in the air, including the theory of gravitation, but also nothing of the rest of contemporary physics." Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
EINSTEIN'S BIZARRENESS THAT KILLED PHYSICS | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | September 9th 15 06:23 PM |
EINSTEIN'S LIE THAT KILLED PHYSICS | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | June 15th 15 09:25 AM |
HOW EINSTEIN KILLED PHYSICS | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 3 | July 27th 14 11:47 AM |
THE FIELD THEORY THAT KILLED PHYSICS | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | July 19th 14 12:12 AM |
A Question For Those Who Truly Understand The Theory of Relativity (Was: Einstein's GR as a Gauge Theory and Shipov's Torsion Field) | Larry Hammick | Astronomy Misc | 1 | February 26th 05 02:22 AM |