![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've always been under the impression that the Mars rovers were sent up largely with the intent of seeking to discover if there is or has ever been life on Mars.
Turns out, they're not going to send this 2.5 billion-dollar gizmo that was sent to explore Mars anywhere near where there could conceivably actually be life, i.e. where there's water. Supposedly because of concern over the potential for introducing Earth microbes into the Mars ecosystem. Say what? Apparently 2.5 billion doesn't buy an explorer that's clean enough? So under what circumstances would they ever be utterly certain that anything they send up is completely, unquestionably sterile? So is this rover program another expensive bill of goods just like the shuttle was? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity, now in its seventh yearon Mars, has a new capability | Sam Wormley[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | March 24th 10 03:30 AM |
FWD: ESA puts paid to Hoaxland's "Face on Mars" scam once and for all | OM | History | 3 | October 24th 06 09:10 AM |
NASA Claims No Life On Mars and Embargos Mars Rover Data. | Thomas Lee Elifritz | Astronomy Misc | 6 | February 20th 05 06:54 PM |
Science Names Mars Rover Mission Science Program as Breakthrough of the Year | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 16th 04 09:22 PM |
Fetch, Rover, Fetch! You control the Mars Exploration Rover Software -- Freeware | Tom | Amateur Astronomy | 9 | January 6th 04 12:36 PM |