New fossil discovery

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2...lution-change/

I read quite a few articles on these discoveries and the accompanying comments that inevitably turn to science vs religion via Darwinism vs Genesis while keeping in mind that this is basically the route readers and contributors to sci.astro.amateur take.

Under normal circumstances there would be no problem accepting an evolutionary narrative that includes these fossils along with the Neanderthal man discoveries which represent the first real division from humanity as we exist presently however the empirical doctrine that people of white skin and black skin presently occupy the same streets but not the same evolutionary level haunts these new discoveries -

"At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla." Darwin

A competent committee of inquiry would untangle the childish contemporary view which ignores the central theme of 'natural selection' and simply writes over the distinctions Darwin and his followers drew between man and apes with people of black skin forming an intermediary between humanity as we see our race now and apes as we also see them presently.

It is a tragedy, the chronology of discoveries would have prevented a hideous ideology from gaining momentum because this is no racist issue of black slave and white master, this is far beyond racism as it promotes a distinction that doesn't exist and affirmed by the human genome project.

Maybe one person in 10,000 could identify what Darwin and his contemporaries tried to promote minus the fossil discoveries that began with Neanderthal man.

It is difficult to know if anyone truly has a grasp of this particular tragedy where they simply re-wrote over the original empirical reasoning which involved having white and black skin people sharing the same street while not being at the same evolutionary level. In this case a single image will suffice -

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...and_skulls.png

Of course Darwin came up with the nightmare ideology in 1838 and long before the impact of the Neanderthal fossils entered the scene so in true empirical fashion they simply shifted white people killing savage races (people of black skin) to humanity killing the Neanderthals in the 'survival of the fittest'.


This is not the one and only time this happened and even today they are now trying to re-write the 'solar vs sidereal' fiction to an even worse one based on a non-cyclical assertion -

"At the time of the dinosaurs, Earth completed one rotation in about 23 hours," says MacMillan, who is a member of the VLBI team at NASA Goddard. "In the year 1820, a rotation took exactly 24 hours, or 86,400 standard seconds.. Since 1820, the mean solar day has increased by about 2.5 milliseconds." NASA

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsyst...ra-second.html


There is another one of these things but that is for a different day as the attempt to re-write the principles of timekeeping to an even worse condition is more immediate even of it can't be stopped in November.

I didn't believe men could be so gruesome and live with themselves on account of what they are prepared to believe but thank God I am never get used to it through a sense of dismay even though the fight goes on.