EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY : THE TWIN ABSURDITY

Einstein's relativity is an inconsistency - it predicts that the travelling twin returns both younger and older than his stationary brother. However the polygon scenario introduced by Einstein in 1905 makes the former prediction (youthfulness) demonstrable while the latter (oldness) remains hidden. Here is a reinterpretation of the polygon scenario that validates both predictions:

Let us imagine that the ants spread out on the closed polygonal line are STATIONARY clocks:

http://www.wpclipart.com/page_frames...e_portrait.png

According to Einstein's relativity, if a single moving clock travels along the polygonal line and is consecutively checked against the multiple stationary clocks, it will show less and less time elapsed than them. In terms of ants, the single travelling ant gets younger and younger than stationary brothers it consecutively meets.

Let us reverse the scenario: the multiple clocks/ants are now MOVING - they travel with constant speed along the closed polygonal line and pass a single stationary clock/ant located in the middle of one of the sides of the polygon. Again, the single (stationary this time) clock is consecutively checked against the multiple (moving this time) clocks passing it.

According to Einstein's relativity, the single stationary clock will show less and less time elapsed than the multiple moving clocks consecutively passing it. In terms of ants, the single stationary ant gets younger and younger than moving brothers it consecutively meets.

Clearly Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light postulate entails absurdities and should be rejected as false.

Pentcho Valev