Nature is a static, four dimensional timescape. 

PRE Style='White-Space: PRE !important; Font-Size: 18px !important;Font-Family: monospace !important;'Â*
Double-A, Thanks to General Relativity, we now know that
nature is a static, four dimensional timescape.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eterna...phy_of_time%29

The future is just as fixed as the past.

Randomness is ignorance, nothing more, nothing less.

God is nature, nothing more, nothing less.

Science is the best religion.

http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Einstein.HTM
http://Jeff-Relf.Me/The_Cosmic_Horizon_.HTM

On Monday, June 23, 2014 1:00:54 AM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
*
Double-A, Thanks to General Relativity, we now know that
nature is a static, four dimensional timescape.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eterna...phy_of_time%29

The future is just as fixed as the past.

Randomness is ignorance, nothing more, nothing less.

God is nature, nothing more, nothing less.

Science is the best religion.

http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Einstein.HTM
http://Jeff-Relf.Me/The_Cosmic_Horizon_.HTM

Except GR and SR are each subjective as to our very own interpretation that's in a cosmic flowing time-warp flux all of its own. To most other galaxies we hardly even exist as other than a distant redshifted item that's about to be thoroughly sliced and diced by another somewhat larger redshifted item of half again to twice as massive, and that outcome is getting sucked into the Great Attractor that's also redshifted nearly past the point of no return. Go figure.

If we had already existed within the Great Attractor, we'd be surrounded by a great deal of locally blueshifted stuff, such as a few million galaxies head towards us from all directions. Hard to imagine how the BB managed to screw that one up.