The core problem

RepubliCONS do not accept the word "United" in "The United States of
America." They also couldn't care less about anything that does not
put money into their wallets or business's wallets and the idea of
social responsibility does not reside in their greedy brains.


I am,
Starstuffed and a proud Democrat

On Thursday, May 15, 2014 3:32:16 PM UTC-4, Starstuffed wrote:
RepubliCONS do not accept the word "United" in "The United States of
America." They also couldn't care less about anything that does not
put money into their wallets or business's wallets and the idea of
social responsibility does not reside in their greedy brains.

This suggests otherwise:

http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=2682730&page=1

Liberals actually give more, it's just that they're not giving their OWN money!

On Thu, 15 May 2014 16:52:44 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Thursday, May 15, 2014 3:32:16 PM UTC-4, Starstuffed wrote:
RepubliCONS do not accept the word "United" in "The United States of
America." They also couldn't care less about anything that does not
put money into their wallets or business's wallets and the idea of
social responsibility does not reside in their greedy brains.

This suggests otherwise:

http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=2682730&page=1

Liberals actually give more, it's just that they're not giving their OWN money!

You can shoot a thousand holes in the quality of that experiment!

Actually, it turns out that when you correct for giving to churches,
which is largely not charitable, liberals and the irreligious give a
higher percentage of their income.

On Thursday, May 15, 2014 8:16:00 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2014 16:52:44 -0700 (PDT), wsnell01 wrote:

On Thursday, May 15, 2014 3:32:16 PM UTC-4, Starstuffed wrote:
RepubliCONS do not accept the word "United" in "The United States of
America." They also couldn't care less about anything that does not
put money into their wallets or business's wallets and the idea of
social responsibility does not reside in their greedy brains.

This suggests otherwise:

http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=2682730&page=1

Liberals actually give more, it's just that they're not giving their OWN money!

You can shoot a thousand holes in the quality of that experiment!

Actually, it turns out that when you correct for giving to churches,
which is largely not charitable, liberals and the irreligious give a
higher percentage of their income.

Proof?

Here read this and use your reading comprehension (such as it is) this time:

http://townhall.com/columnists/johns...rity/page/full

The Salvation Army buckets collected more in Sioux Falls than in SF. No surprise there.

On Fri, 16 May 2014 02:30:38 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Here read this and use your reading comprehension (such as it is) this time:

http://townhall.com/columnists/johns...rity/page/full

The Salvation Army buckets collected more in Sioux Falls than in SF. No surprise there.

If you think that is a well designed experiment, it explains much
about your serious lack of understanding of many scientific topics.

On Thu, 15 May 2014 19:32:16 GMT, Starstuffed wrote:

RepubliCONS do not accept the word "United" in "The United States of
America." They also couldn't care less about anything that does not
put money into their wallets or business's wallets and the idea of
social responsibility does not reside in their greedy brains.

I am,
Starstuffed and a proud Democrat


Get out in the real world - and get to know what grass-roots
Republican's are like. It might surprise you that they are not carbon
copy clones of the view you have fabricated in your head.
--
Email address is a Spam trap.

On Fri, 16 May 2014 17:01:05 -0400, Bill wrote:

Get out in the real world - and get to know what grass-roots
Republican's are like. It might surprise you that they are not carbon
copy clones of the view you have fabricated in your head.

Unfortunately, it doesn't really matter what your "grass-roots
Republicans" are like. Because Starstuffed's characterization is
pretty accurate when it comes to the Republicans holding office in
most places, and certainly those in Congress. They're destroying the
country, and appear to have no qualms at all about doing so.

So unless those Republican voters start refusing to vote for the
teabaggers and other crackpots, we're all in trouble.

On 5/16/2014 7:28 PM, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 17:01:05 -0400, Bill wrote:

Get out in the real world - and get to know what grass-roots
Republican's are like. It might surprise you that they are not carbon
copy clones of the view you have fabricated in your head.

Unfortunately, it doesn't really matter what your "grass-roots
Republicans" are like. Because Starstuffed's characterization is
pretty accurate when it comes to the Republicans holding office in
most places, and certainly those in Congress. They're destroying the
country, and appear to have no qualms at all about doing so.

So unless those Republican voters start refusing to vote for the
teabaggers and other crackpots, we're all in trouble.



I feel the exact same way about liberal democrats. They are doing a
great job of destroying our big cities...

On Sat, 17 May 2014 07:52:01 -0400, AM wrote:

I feel the exact same way about liberal democrats. They are doing a
great job of destroying our big cities...

There are hardly any liberal Democrats to be found. Most lie somewhere
between conservative and moderate in the political spectrum.

On Friday, May 16, 2014 9:35:33 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 02:30:38 -0700 (PDT), wsnell01 wrote:

Here read this and use your reading comprehension (such as it is) this time:

http://townhall.com/columnists/johns...rity/page/full

The Salvation Army buckets collected more in Sioux Falls than in SF. No surprise there.

If you think that is a well designed experiment

No one said it was an "experiment" but South Dakota is strongly "red" and California strongly "blue" and the results quite clear. Data on peoples' actual behavior is more valuable than your incoherent musings on same.