![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Seems strange that the ATV flights are to stop after the next one, at least
if I read the press releases correctly. Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, May 16, 2014 7:34:12 AM UTC-4, Jeff Findley wrote:
No bucks, no Buck Rogers. ATV is quite expensive to produce, but it does make one wonder that ESA's contribution to ISS will be going forward. Jeff -- Computer simulations and code for de-orbiting ISS? Dave |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well they are going to have to think of that, as I don't think an
uncontrolled return would be very safe, considering the size. Seems a shame though that nobody is thinking about the next steps. Maybe the moon or an Asteroid will be the next base, who knows. I do think we need to press on as a planet though, as we are barely crawling and if the human race wants to outlive the solar system as it is, there is a very long road ahead.The fact that no aliens have arrived sort of tends to point to the fact that many civilisations die before they achieve any kind of intergalactic travel, assuming its actually possible in the universe we live within of course. Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active "David Spain" wrote in message ... On Friday, May 16, 2014 7:34:12 AM UTC-4, Jeff Findley wrote: No bucks, no Buck Rogers. ATV is quite expensive to produce, but it does make one wonder that ESA's contribution to ISS will be going forward. Jeff -- Computer simulations and code for de-orbiting ISS? Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|