![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is claimed that a big bang occurred 14 billion years ago at a central point
in space and all matter was ejected outward at c from that point. If we observe a galaxy that is believed to be 13 billion light years away, it should take about 13 billion years for its light to reach us. It is therefore claimed that the light we are seeing must have been emitted 1 BYs after the supposed BB occurred. Does this mean that: 1) The galaxy is 12 billion LYs from the centre and we are 1 billion away in the opposite direction? 2) We and the galaxy are both 6.5 BLYs from that point? 3) We are 12 BLYs from the centre and the galaxy is 1 BLY from it in the opposite direction? 4) Quite coincidentally, little planet Earth happens to be located right at the centre? 5) Neither of these. 6) There was no BB at all? Henry Wilson DSc. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 07:39:57 +1000, Henry Wilson DSc. hw@.... wrote:
It is claimed that a big bang occurred 14 billion years ago at a central point in space and all matter was ejected outward at c from that point. idiot. all material was not blastd out at c. If we observe a galaxy that is believed to be 13 billion light years away, it should take about 13 billion years for its light to reach us. It is therefore claimed that the light we are seeing must have been emitted 1 BYs after the supposed BB occurred. Does this mean that: 1) The galaxy is 12 billion LYs from the centre and we are 1 billion away in the opposite direction? idiot. noone knows where the center is. Noone knows the exact time of the creation of our galaxy or any others for that matter 2) We and the galaxy are both 6.5 BLYs from that point? from what point? what the hell are you talking about? 3) We are 12 BLYs from the centre and the galaxy is 1 BLY from it in the opposite direction? 4) Quite coincidentally, little planet Earth happens to be located right at the centre? 5) Neither of these. 6) There was no BB at all? Henry Wilson DSc. sorry for responding in the first place. This crap makes no sense at all. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/30/13 6/30/13 4:39 PM, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote:
It is claimed that a big bang occurred 14 billion years ago at a central point in space and all matter was ejected outward at c from that point. [...] That is not the usual big bang at all. Not even close. When you get basic details wrong like this, it's no wonder you are mystified by modern physics. The problem is YOURS, and YOURS ALONE, because you make things up and then claim they are what "physics claims". The "contradictions" and "problems" you find are due to YOUR OWN MISTAKES. To find out what the big bang theory really is, look up Ned Wright's cosmology page: http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm Do not expect to spend less than several hours on this, as it is subtle and complex. DO NOT IMPOSE YOUR OWN PERSONAL AGENDA ON HIS TEXT -- read what HE writes, not what you would have written. Tom Roberts |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 22:57:26 -0500, Tom Roberts
wrote: On 6/30/13 6/30/13 4:39 PM, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote: It is claimed that a big bang occurred 14 billion years ago at a central point in space and all matter was ejected outward at c from that point. [...] That is not the usual big bang at all. Not even close. When you get basic details wrong like this, it's no wonder you are mystified by modern physics. The problem is YOURS, and YOURS ALONE, because you make things up and then claim they are what "physics claims". The "contradictions" and "problems" you find are due to YOUR OWN MISTAKES. To find out what the big bang theory really is, look up Ned Wright's cosmology page: http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm Do not expect to spend less than several hours on this, as it is subtle and complex. DO NOT IMPOSE YOUR OWN PERSONAL AGENDA ON HIS TEXT -- read what HE writes, not what you would have written. Here is Wríghts first paragraph... The darkness of the night sky - Olbers' paradox. Truth: Tired light The Hubble Law - the linear distance vs redshift law. The data are now very good. Truth: Tired light and BaTh predictions. Homogeneity - fair data showing that our location in the Universe is not special. Why the hell should it be? Isotropy - very strong data showing that the sky looks the same in all directions to 1 part in 100,000. Great!...so if we can see galaxies 13 BLYs away, the supposed BB must have occurred at least 26 BY ago. Time dilation in supernova light curves. HAHAHAHHA! That's a new one.... tell us more about it Tom. I don't think I'll waste any more time reading Ned Wright's crap. Tom Roberts Henry Wilson DSc. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 8:24:06 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 07:39:57 +1000, Henry Wilson DSc. hw@.... wrote: It is claimed that a big bang occurred 14 billion years ago at a central point in space and all matter was ejected outward at c from that point. idiot. all material was not blastd out at c. Before you go calling someone an idiot, you need to understand that "c" means "less than c"... otherwise you may look like the actual idiot... idiot. noone knows where the center is. Noone knows the exact time of the creation of our galaxy or any others for that matter Also, you need to understand that "noone" is not a word... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/30/2013 4:39 PM, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote:
It is claimed that a big bang occurred 14 billion years ago at a central point in space and all matter was ejected outward at c from that point. Can you give me the author and title or a URL to any reading material where you got this? This seems counter to everything I've read about the big bang. -- - Odd Bodkin, maker of fine toys, tools, tables |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30/06/2013 5:39 PM, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote:
It is claimed that a big bang occurred 14 billion years ago at a central point in space and all matter was ejected outward at c from that point. There is no central point for space. What is the central point of a *surface* of a sphere? The surface of the sphere has no central point, even if the volume of the sphere has a central point. But the volume of the sphere exists in a higher dimension than the surface area of the sphere, so it's a different thing. So similarly, there is no central point for space in the Universe, but there is a central point for the space-time of the Universe. Similar to how the surface area of a sphere and the volume of a sphere are at different dimensional levels, the space vs. the space-time of the Universe are at different dimensional levels. So with that one misconception of yours out of the way, the rest of your questions become irrelevant. snip Yousuf Khan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 12:02:22 -0500, Odd Bodkin wrote:
On 6/30/2013 4:39 PM, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote: It is claimed that a big bang occurred 14 billion years ago at a central point in space and all matter was ejected outward at c from that point. Can you give me the author and title or a URL to any reading material where you got this? This seems counter to everything I've read about the big bang. Try wiki Henry Wilson DSc. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:03:20 -0400, Yousuf Khan
wrote: On 30/06/2013 5:39 PM, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote: It is claimed that a big bang occurred 14 billion years ago at a central point in space and all matter was ejected outward at c from that point. There is no central point for space. What is the central point of a *surface* of a sphere? The surface of the sphere has no central point, even if the volume of the sphere has a central point. But the volume of the sphere exists in a higher dimension than the surface area of the sphere, so it's a different thing. So ****ing what? The universe is a volume not a bloody surface If there was a Big Bang, as some idiots still think, it must have happened at a point in that VOLUME. So similarly, there is no central point for space in the Universe, but there is a central point for the space-time of the Universe. Similar to how the surface area of a sphere and the volume of a sphere are at different dimensional levels, the space vs. the space-time of the Universe are at different dimensional levels. What a load of crap... So with that one misconception of yours out of the way, the rest of your questions become irrelevant. snip Yousuf Khan Henry Wilson DSc. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Big bangers | oriel36[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 24 | March 7th 12 10:47 PM |
Free the Big Bangers ! | Jeffâ–²Relf[_31_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 26th 08 10:47 AM |
Big Bangers Prove How Stupid They Are | Mad Scientist | Misc | 61 | August 16th 04 02:03 PM |
Earth Too Noisy for S.E.T.I.? | Nomen Nescio | Space Shuttle | 1 | November 27th 03 03:41 AM |
Noisy WU | Gary G. Taylor | SETI | 2 | October 26th 03 05:26 AM |