Chapt20 Layered ages of Cosmos from 6.5 to 20.2 billion years old#1602 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Chapter 20: layered age of Cosmos with 6.5 billion years new Cosmos
yet old
*galaxies of the Uranium Atom Totality 20.2 billion years old

Layered age of Cosmos with 6.5 billion years old Cosmos yet old
galaxies of the Uranium Atom Totality 20.2 billion years old; the
data including discussion over the layered ages of the Solar System
where Earth and Sun are likely to be twice as old as Jupiter.


It used to be in the late 1990s that the best supporting evidence for
the Atom Totality theory was not
the blackbody Cosmic microwave background radiation nor the missing
mass, but the age of the Cosmos and the age of the oldest stars.


I am recounting the history of the 1990s as best my memory can
recall.
The Freedman team was working on the age of the overall Cosmos and
the
Sandage team profiled the age of the oldest stars. And when the
Freedman team announced publically worldwide their findings if I
remember correctly they said the Cosmos was 8 billion years old.
While
years prior, Sandage had kept getting older and older ages for stars
and was approaching 20 billion years.


So right away, since the world was deeply in love with the Big Bang
theory, that the pressure was on for Freedman to scale up or fudge
up
her 8 billion years and for Sandage to fudge down his 20 billion
years.
If you thought corporate corruption of cooking the books or fudging
the
data in corporate America in the late 1990s with Enron and WorldCom
were outrageous, well in my estimation what Freedman and Sandage did
for ages of Cosmos and stars, in my opinion was on the same level of
reasoning gone berserk.


In the Big Bang theory, of course, if Freedman says the Cosmos is 8
billion years old and Sandage says the oldest star is 20 billion
years
old before the fudging, of course that makes no sense. But in the
Atom
Totality theory,
you see, the Universe is layers of age, like a onion is layers of
age
growth. So that the Sandage 20 billion year old (correct me if wrong
but memory was some Cepheid variables or was it supernova?) stars
could
have been the older layer of the Uranium Atom Totality and where
Freedman was getting an age of the overall Cosmos as 8 billion years
old because she was measuring the newer layer of the Universe-- the
Plutonium Atom Totality layer.


So in an Atom Totality the universe is layered ages and thus the
Freedman and Sandage reports favor the Atom Totality. And here we
have
a case of where scientists are disobeying the profession of science
itself. That the data is true and correct and the theory has to be
adjusted or discarded of the Big Bang. And that the moment
scientists
fudge their data to converge in the middle with one age, well, they
stopped being scientists.



There was a lot of pressure for Freedman to increase the age of
the Cosmos and a lot of pressure on Sandage to decrease the age
of the oldest stars, but that is not how science works. We fit
the theory to the facts and data, not fit the facts and data to
a preconceived theory.


In an Atom Totality, the matter is layered and layered ages like
the tree rings of a tree or the onion layers of an onion as it grows
bigger. So what Freedman found in a 8 billion year Cosmos is the
Plutonium Atom layer and what Sandage found in the oldest stars
of 20 billion years is of the previous Uranium Atom Totality layer.




Chapter 20 Layered age of Cosmos
Subject: How we can have a 6 billion year old Cosmos yet stars that
are 20 billion years old


*SCIENCE NEWS, Vol. 146, *Oct 8, 1994 pages 232-234
titled SEARCHING FOR
COSMOLOGY'S HOLY GRAIL: *HUBBLE TELESCOPE JOINS A
CONSTANT BATTLE


--- start quoting of SN in part ---


* *The Hubble constant represents a measure of the
rate at which the
universe is expanding -- how rapidly each object in
the universe speeds away
from any other object. Armed with this knowledge,
scientists can estimate
the age of the cosmos -- how long since the Big Bang
it has taken galaxies
to reach their current locations.
. . .
* *Many researchers are hoping that the recent arrival
of another Hubble -- the
Hubble Space Telescope -- may resolve the controversy.
Last December, the
telescope got a new pair of eyeglasses and a new
camera with built-in optics to
correct for Hubble's notoriously flawed primary
mirror. The corrective optics
enable the telescope to produce sharp images of
individual bright stars in
galaxies 10 times farther from Earth than had been
possible before.
. . .
* *Compared with other standard candles, such as
supernovas, Cepheids are
relatively dim. Thus, astronomers had only observed
them in galaxies no more than
about 25 million light-years from Earth. But
scientists now report that they have
seen Cepheids in the Virgo cluster of galaxies--
roughly twice as far from Earth.
* *Wendy L. Freedman of the Carnegie Observatories in
Pasadena, Calif., and her
colleagues, including John P. Huchra of Harvard,
recently announced that they had
used the repaired Hubble Space Telescope to identify
and study several dozen
Cepheids in a spiral member of the Virgo cluster
called M100. The report is one
of the first post repair studies to measure the Hubble
constant. Over the next
3 years, the team will use Hubble to search for
Cepheids in other members of the
Virgo cluster as well as in certain spiral galaxies
used as distance indicators.
* *Freedman and her coworkers didn't divulge any
numbers for the Hubble constant
when they presented their work at an August meeting of
the International
Astronomical Union in the Hague, Netherlands. Instead,
they'll report their
conclusions in the Oct. 27 NATURE.
. . .
* *Alan R. Sandage of the Carnegie Observatories, . .