solving Retrograde motion of our Solar System Chapt16.15 GravityCells #1475 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

If Gravity-cells exist then it should be easily proven by that of
prograde motion versus retrograde motion and it should be as much of a
pattern as is the Titius Bode Rule and the orbital speeds.

Now I know I have not yet tied together the Titius Bode Rule with the
orbital speeds, but rather, if I discuss Retrograde motion first, I
would be including the comprehensive tie-in of Titius Bode Rule with
orbital speeds.

Now, neither Newtonian gravity nor General Relativity could ever see
retrograde or prograde motion as a pattern throughout the Solar System
and throughout astronomy and cosmology. To those two fake theories of
physics, retrograde motion was all happenstance, or accident and where
it is swept under the carpet of shame by suggesting some collision. In
Newtonian and General Relativity, whenever a solution to patterns is
wanted, they seem to always revert to collisions or to silly cosmic
friction of tidal forces.

The Maxwell Equations as EM-gravity easily tells us why Retrograde and
Prograde Motion are patterned in our Solar System.

--- quoting Wikipedia on retrograde motion ---

In our Solar System, all the planets and almost all of the other
objects that revolve in orbit around the Sun, with the exception of
many comets, do so in the "prograde" direction, i.e the same sense as
the rotation of the Sun. Most planets also rotate in the same prograde
direction, the exceptions being Venus and Uranus, which have
retrograde rotations. Most satellites of planets also revolve around
their planets in the prograde sense. (In the case of the satellites of
Uranus, this means they revolve in the same sense as Uranus's
rotation, which is retrograde relative to the Sun.) There are some
satellites which revolve in the retrograde sense, but these are
generally small and distant from their planets, except for Neptune's
satellite Triton, which is large and close. It is thought that these
retrograde satellites, including Triton, are bodies which have been
captured into orbit around their planets, having been formed
elsewhere.
--- end quoting Wikipedia on retrograde motion ---

Now, take the right hand rule from Maxwell Equations and use just the
right hand rule. Now, if the Sun were as is with a gravity cell and
was rotating as the right hand rule and if Mercury were the only
planet, the Sun's gravity cell would force the same right hand rule
(prograde) motion upon the planet's orbit and upon the planet's
rotation axis.

Now if all the planets of the solar system were the same as Mercury,
then all of them would be Prograde Motion with the Sun, however, the
planets vary in mass, and thus vary in amount of magnetic monopoles
each carries. So that large planets like Jupiter and Saturn are going
to ruin the prograde motion of Uranus. And the highly magnetized Earth
is going to have its own gravity cell with steep contributions of its
magnetosphere upon that gravity cell that interfers with the planet
Venus and making Venus prograde become retrograde.

Now take a quick Right Hand Rule test: two right hand rules side by
side and notice that the spin of one is going to counter the spin of
the next. If we had a Right Hand Rule next to a Left Hand Rule, the
spin of one will compliment and increase the spin of the other.

So, when the Sun, via the Maxwell Equations forces the rotation spin
of all the planets to be the same as the Sun's gravity-cell, there is
trouble in Venus due to Earth and there is trouble in Uranus due to
Saturn and Neptune.

So, once scientists throw out Newtonian gravity and General Relativity
because neither can explain how the Sun moving at 220km/sec in Space,
yet Earth moving a mere paltry 29km/sec in Space, and replace those
fake theories with a true theory-- the Maxwell Equations -- that we
begin to explain retrograde and prograde motions.



--

A Google author archive search for AP reveals massive vandalism
starting May 
2012 where only a few posts per month survive, 
whereas
another poster David Bernier, all of his posts continue to be 
author-
archived. 
A Google search of just Archimedes Plutonium 
reveals
massive search-engine-bombing, and likely the reason for 
wanting to
destroy the author-archive of AP. 
If we listen to the 
excuse-fool
Jeff Relf:

Google Groups is 100% uncensored, so it isn't fully
indexed. Were Google Groups fully indexed, it'd be used to game
the system;

We would think all posters by May 2012 have some of their posts
missing in the
author archive, but apparently only AP is targeted for deletions of
his author archive posts.

Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair
author- 
archiving of AP math posts for the past several years as seen
he

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies