![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the last 2 weeks I've seen several, well exotic is the polite word,
proposals from NASA. They include: 1) Grabbing an asteroid robotically and parking it in lunar orbit for eventual manned visit 2) Starting nuclear rocket programs, maybe more than one. 3) Skylab II 4) Director Bolden talking about Warp Drive and beyond Mars 5) an EM-L2 visit (trip to nowhere) Plus the existing things already in work like SLS & Orion. Is this just the "run it up the flag pole and see who salutes" thing? Different centers competing? Lack of direction from Headquarters? Is there any consideration of the budget in any of these wild ideas? It just doesn't seem to be a properly run organization with a focus on worthy manned space activities. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why NASA should focus on the Moon, not Mars - Henry Spencer | Jeff Findley | Policy | 63 | April 5th 09 06:51 PM |
DLR in C5 prime focus: cannot get fully in-focus images | RePete | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | October 30th 06 11:01 AM |
NASA space eyes focus on Deep Impact target | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | June 3rd 05 09:14 AM |
Am I the only one that thinks NASA has lost it? | Scott Ferrin | History | 6 | October 6th 03 06:19 AM |
NASA And NAACP Focus On The Future | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 1 | July 11th 03 12:16 PM |