![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The easiest of all insights to understand is why twilight lengths
diminish towards equatorial latitudes,the obvious reason being that faster surface speeds passing through the circle of illumination cause a rapid transition from daylight to darkness at the equator and the transition becomes longer as the speeds diminish towards the polar latitudes. The polar twilight around the equinox is a separate issue as its cause arises from the orbital behavior of the Earth carrying the polar coordinate through the circle of illumination at a vastly slower rate and contemporaries make themselves look ridiculous by appealing to a 'Sun angle' rather than looking at twilight in its daily and separate seasonal formats. The nuisance Ra/Dec observers appeal to a blatantly stupid explanation that doesn't dignify a response as it is the usual stellar circumpolar celestial sphere and the Sun hitting the horizon at a different angle whereas common sense determines surface rotational speeds are the cause - http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/que...php?number=121 So,with so many world travelers who can now move quickly from place to place and who notice the pronounced difference in twilight lengths,it is time to act like adults and give them a proper explanation using the daily motion of the planet. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, October 8, 2012 9:54:58 PM UTC-7, oriel36 wrote:
The easiest of all insights to understand is why twilight lengths diminish towards equatorial latitudes,the obvious reason being that faster surface speeds passing through the circle of illumination cause a rapid transition from daylight to darkness at the equator and the transition becomes longer as the speeds diminish towards the polar latitudes. The polar twilight around the equinox is a separate issue as its cause arises from the orbital behavior of the Earth carrying the polar coordinate through the circle of illumination at a vastly slower rate and contemporaries make themselves look ridiculous by appealing to a 'Sun angle' rather than looking at twilight in its daily and separate seasonal formats. The nuisance Ra/Dec observers appeal to a blatantly stupid explanation that doesn't dignify a response as it is the usual stellar circumpolar celestial sphere and the Sun hitting the horizon at a different angle whereas common sense determines surface rotational speeds are the cause - http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/que...php?number=121 So,with so many world travelers who can now move quickly from place to place and who notice the pronounced difference in twilight lengths,it is time to act like adults and give them a proper explanation using the daily motion of the planet. It is just not that simple... http://www.gandraxa.com/length_of_day.xml |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 9, 5:26*pm, palsing wrote:
On Monday, October 8, 2012 9:54:58 PM UTC-7, oriel36 wrote: The easiest of all insights to understand is why twilight lengths diminish towards equatorial latitudes,the obvious reason being that faster surface speeds passing through the circle of illumination cause a rapid transition from daylight to darkness at the equator and the transition becomes longer as the speeds diminish towards the polar latitudes. The polar twilight around the equinox is a separate issue as its cause arises from the orbital behavior of the Earth carrying the polar coordinate through the circle of illumination at a vastly slower rate and contemporaries make themselves look ridiculous by appealing to a 'Sun angle' rather than looking at twilight in its daily and separate seasonal formats. The nuisance Ra/Dec observers appeal to a blatantly stupid explanation that doesn't dignify a response as it is the usual stellar circumpolar celestial sphere and the Sun hitting the horizon at a different angle whereas common sense *determines surface rotational speeds are the cause - http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/que...php?number=121 So,with so many world travelers who can now move quickly from place to place and who notice the pronounced difference in twilight lengths,it is time to act like adults and give them a proper explanation using the daily motion of the planet. It is just not that simple... http://www.gandraxa.com/length_of_day.xml Twilight lengths are the easiest way to understand that the Earth is round and rotating and in broad brushstrokes - latitudinal speeds correlate with twilight lengths,the faster the surface speed the quicker the transition from daylight to darkness as a meridian passes through the circle of illumination.Of course it takes an astronomer to convert one rotation in one 24 hour day into the details of 15 degrees of rotation per hour equating to 1037.5 miles per hour at the equator hence the shortest twilight occurs at the equator and lengthens as the rotational speeds diminish towards the poles . It has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with puny Ra/Dec ideologies of 'Sun angles' hitting the horizon . So,here is an insight that needs processing and later investigations will come the polar twilight where the polar coordinates act like a beacon for the orbital behavior of the Earth and especially at the equinoxes as those coordinates turn through the circle of illumination in being carried through it by the orbital behavior of the Earth. I don't expect many readers of grasping the latter insight presently but the rotational speeds and twilight lengths as an insight is within the comprehension of teenagers so the lack of a clear explanation using surface speeds makes it fairly obvious that there is a lot of welfare fraud going on out there at the expense of students and the wider population. Again,this is a new way to approach twilight lengths in an era of rapid travel between latitudes where the experience is fairly dramatic for people traveling from fairly high latitudes to equatorial latitudes.There is no process to work this explanation into mainstream viewing for obvious reasons so the difficulty is not technical as the explanation is correct,the difficulty is the lack of a valid astronomical institution that can transmit the observation - nothing more and nothing less. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/8/12 11:54 PM, oriel36 wrote:
The easiest of all insights to understand is why twilight lengths diminish towards equatorial latitudes,the obvious reason being that faster surface speeds passing through the circle of illumination cause a rapid transition from daylight to darkness at the equator and the transition becomes longer as the speeds diminish towards the polar latitudes. Practical Calculation for the Length of Twilight http://www.gandraxa.com/length_of_day.xml The sun does not appear or disappear just so, a shorter or longer twilight period begins before the start of the day and ends after the end of the day, i.e. the twilight affects the duration of the "dark" night, never the duration of the "bright" day. For most purposes, it is sufficient to take into consideration the Civil Twilight plus the Nautical Twilight, but not the Astronomical Twilight (which latter would be interpreted as fully dark anyway for casual observers). |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 8, 10:54*pm, oriel36 wrote:
The easiest of all insights to understand is why twilight lengths diminish towards equatorial latitudes,the obvious reason being that faster surface speeds passing through the circle of illumination cause a rapid transition from daylight to darkness at the equator and the transition becomes longer as the speeds diminish towards the polar latitudes. That is absolutely right, since the zone of twilight is clearly X miles wide at the terminator, no matter what your latitude is, and so twilight takes longer when that zone subtends a larger angle along a given circle of latitude. The polar twilight around the equinox is a separate issue as its cause arises from the orbital behavior of the Earth carrying the polar coordinate through the circle of illumination at a vastly slower rate and contemporaries make themselves look ridiculous by appealing to a 'Sun angle' rather than looking at twilight in its daily and separate seasonal formats. But there is no contradiction between your view and looking at it on the basis of a "sun angle". Remember, when we are *not* at the equinox, the terminator is inclined with respect to the equator instead of perpendicular to it, and this makes twilight take even longer at the higher latitudes because of the angle at which the circle of latitude cuts the terminator. John Savard |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 12:09:35 PM UTC-7, oriel36 wrote:
On Oct 9, 5:26*pm, palsing wrote: On Monday, October 8, 2012 9:54:58 PM UTC-7, oriel36 wrote: The easiest of all insights to understand is why twilight lengths diminish towards equatorial latitudes,the obvious reason being that faster surface speeds passing through the circle of illumination cause a rapid transition from daylight to darkness at the equator and the transition becomes longer as the speeds diminish towards the polar latitudes. The polar twilight around the equinox is a separate issue as its cause arises from the orbital behavior of the Earth carrying the polar coordinate through the circle of illumination at a vastly slower rate and contemporaries make themselves look ridiculous by appealing to a 'Sun angle' rather than looking at twilight in its daily and separate seasonal formats. The nuisance Ra/Dec observers appeal to a blatantly stupid explanation that doesn't dignify a response as it is the usual stellar circumpolar celestial sphere and the Sun hitting the horizon at a different angle whereas common sense *determines surface rotational speeds are the cause - http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/que...php?number=121 So,with so many world travelers who can now move quickly from place to place and who notice the pronounced difference in twilight lengths,it is time to act like adults and give them a proper explanation using the daily motion of the planet. It is just not that simple... http://www.gandraxa.com/length_of_day.xml Twilight lengths are the easiest way to understand that the Earth is round and rotating and in broad brushstrokes - latitudinal speeds correlate with twilight lengths,the faster the surface speed the quicker the transition from daylight to darkness as a meridian passes through the circle of illumination.Of course it takes an astronomer to convert one rotation in one 24 hour day into the details of 15 degrees of rotation per hour equating to 1037.5 miles per hour at the equator hence the shortest twilight occurs at the equator and lengthens as the rotational speeds diminish towards the poles . It has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with puny Ra/Dec ideologies of 'Sun angles' hitting the horizon . So,here is an insight that needs processing and later investigations will come the polar twilight where the polar coordinates act like a beacon for the orbital behavior of the Earth and especially at the equinoxes as those coordinates turn through the circle of illumination in being carried through it by the orbital behavior of the Earth. I don't expect many readers of grasping the latter insight presently but the rotational speeds and twilight lengths as an insight is within the comprehension of teenagers so the lack of a clear explanation using surface speeds makes it fairly obvious that there is a lot of welfare fraud going on out there at the expense of students and the wider population. Again,this is a new way to approach twilight lengths in an era of rapid travel between latitudes where the experience is fairly dramatic for people traveling from fairly high latitudes to equatorial latitudes.There is no process to work this explanation into mainstream viewing for obvious reasons so the difficulty is not technical as the explanation is correct,the difficulty is the lack of a valid astronomical institution that can transmit the observation - nothing more and nothing less. You didn't read one word of my link, did you... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 10, 1:32*am, palsing wrote:
On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 12:09:35 PM UTC-7, oriel36 wrote: On Oct 9, 5:26*pm, palsing wrote: On Monday, October 8, 2012 9:54:58 PM UTC-7, oriel36 wrote: The easiest of all insights to understand is why twilight lengths diminish towards equatorial latitudes,the obvious reason being that faster surface speeds passing through the circle of illumination cause a rapid transition from daylight to darkness at the equator and the transition becomes longer as the speeds diminish towards the polar latitudes. The polar twilight around the equinox is a separate issue as its cause arises from the orbital behavior of the Earth carrying the polar coordinate through the circle of illumination at a vastly slower rate and contemporaries make themselves look ridiculous by appealing to a 'Sun angle' rather than looking at twilight in its daily and separate seasonal formats. The nuisance Ra/Dec observers appeal to a blatantly stupid explanation that doesn't dignify a response as it is the usual stellar circumpolar celestial sphere and the Sun hitting the horizon at a different angle whereas common sense *determines surface rotational speeds are the cause - http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/que...php?number=121 So,with so many world travelers who can now move quickly from place to place and who notice the pronounced difference in twilight lengths,it is time to act like adults and give them a proper explanation using the daily motion of the planet. It is just not that simple... http://www.gandraxa.com/length_of_day.xml Twilight lengths are the easiest way to understand that the Earth is round and rotating and in broad brushstrokes - latitudinal speeds correlate with twilight lengths,the faster the surface speed the quicker the transition from daylight to darkness as a meridian passes through the circle of illumination.Of course it takes an astronomer to convert one rotation in one 24 hour day into the details of 15 degrees of rotation per hour equating to 1037.5 miles per hour at the equator hence the shortest twilight occurs at the equator and lengthens as the rotational speeds diminish towards the poles . It has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with puny Ra/Dec ideologies of 'Sun angles' hitting the horizon . So,here is an insight that needs processing and later investigations will come the polar twilight where the polar coordinates act like a beacon for the orbital behavior of the Earth and especially at the equinoxes as those coordinates turn through the circle of illumination in being carried through it by the orbital behavior of the Earth. I don't expect *many readers of grasping the latter insight presently but the rotational speeds and twilight lengths as an insight is within the comprehension of teenagers so the lack of a clear explanation using surface speeds makes it fairly obvious that there is a lot of welfare fraud going on out there at the expense of students and the wider population. Again,this is a new way to approach twilight lengths in an era of rapid *travel between latitudes where the experience is fairly dramatic for people traveling from fairly high latitudes to equatorial latitudes.There is no process to work this explanation into mainstream viewing for obvious reasons so the difficulty is not technical as the explanation is *correct,the difficulty is the lack of a valid astronomical *institution that can transmit the observation - nothing more and nothing less. You didn't read one word of my link, did you... It is quite an experience to be among people who cannot deal with surface speeds of a round and rotating Earth as there is nothing,I repeat,nothing difficult in assigning cause and effect where rotational speeds correlate with twilight lengths.If people choose to act dumb then that is there own business,I am not shouting ever science fiction fans nor magnification guys who occupy roughly the same interpretative level however I will point out that there is presently no astronomical entity in existence to handle a simple insight like this one which can then be forwarded to students as a proof of a round and rotating planet. There is no intellectual bottom to the vicious strain of empiricism,after all,I discovered fairly quickly that even simple insights such as the the rapid or gentle transition from darkness to daylight at different latitudes with its cause are aggressively denied when it shouldn't take more than a few moments to work through the physical considerations.Despite the huge empirical welfare fraud,astronomy must be accomplished one way or another . |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 6:55:44 PM UTC-7, oriel36 wrote:
If people choose to act dumb then that is there own business... Are you kidding? You actually think that millions of people around the world are "choosing to act dumb", while you alone have the insight? You are delusional. http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphoto...67308407_n.jpg |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 10, 4:56*am, palsing wrote:
On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 6:55:44 PM UTC-7, oriel36 wrote: If people choose to act dumb then that is there own business... Are you kidding? You actually think that millions of people around the world are "choosing to act dumb", while you alone have the insight? You are delusional. http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphoto...358_4349728198... It is a fact that latitudinal surface speeds correlate to twilight lengths and prove that the Earth is round and rotating with a maximum speed of 1037.5 miles per hour. The ridiculous Ra/Dec explanation using 'Sun angle' descent is from a community with a lack of sense of solar system scale as individual objects or the distances between them - http://www.universetoday.com/wp-cont...thcompared.jpg Behind the simple explanation of twilight length using surface speeds is the orbital twilight at the polar coordinates around the equinoxes as they are carried around in a circle to the central Sun and why the old perception of axial precession must be dismissed and move to a long term orbital trait - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...ion.svg&page=1 Of course,people who are unable to handle daily twilight lengths and their cause will not be capable of adjusting to the large modification to the explanation for the seasons which introduces an additional axis. I told you before,the natural tendency of the empiricist is to move technical details,even simple one like these,into personal insults becomes a waste of time and energy and you may again get the luxury of saying whatever you wish without a response from me . |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 09/10/2012 20:09, oriel36 wrote:
On Oct 9, 5:26 pm, palsing wrote: On Monday, October 8, 2012 9:54:58 PM UTC-7, oriel36 wrote: The easiest of all insights to understand is why twilight lengths diminish towards equatorial latitudes,the obvious reason being that faster surface speeds passing through the circle of illumination cause a rapid transition from daylight to darkness at the equator and the transition becomes longer as the speeds diminish towards the polar latitudes. The polar twilight around the equinox is a separate issue as its cause arises from the orbital behavior of the Earth carrying the polar coordinate through the circle of illumination at a vastly slower rate and contemporaries make themselves look ridiculous by appealing to a 'Sun angle' rather than looking at twilight in its daily and separate seasonal formats. The nuisance Ra/Dec observers appeal to a blatantly stupid explanation that doesn't dignify a response as it is the usual stellar circumpolar celestial sphere and the Sun hitting the horizon at a different angle whereas common sense determines surface rotational speeds are the cause - http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/que...php?number=121 So,with so many world travelers who can now move quickly from place to place and who notice the pronounced difference in twilight lengths,it is time to act like adults and give them a proper explanation using the daily motion of the planet. It is just not that simple... http://www.gandraxa.com/length_of_day.xml Twilight lengths are the easiest way to understand that the Earth is round and rotating and in broad brushstrokes - latitudinal speeds correlate with twilight lengths,the faster the surface speed the quicker the transition from daylight to darkness as a meridian passes through the circle of illumination.Of course it takes an astronomer to convert one rotation in one 24 hour day into the details of 15 degrees of rotation per hour equating to 1037.5 miles per hour at the equator hence the shortest twilight occurs at the equator and lengthens as the rotational speeds diminish towards the poles . It has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with puny Ra/Dec ideologies of 'Sun angles' hitting the horizon . So,here is an insight that needs processing and later investigations will come the polar twilight where the polar coordinates act like a beacon for the orbital behavior of the Earth and especially at the equinoxes as those coordinates turn through the circle of illumination in being carried through it by the orbital behavior of the Earth. I don't expect many readers of grasping the latter insight presently but the rotational speeds and twilight lengths as an insight is within the comprehension of teenagers so the lack of a clear explanation using surface speeds makes it fairly obvious that there is a lot of welfare fraud going on out there at the expense of students and the wider population. Again,this is a new way to approach twilight lengths in an era of rapid travel between latitudes where the experience is fairly dramatic for people traveling from fairly high latitudes to equatorial latitudes.There is no process to work this explanation into mainstream viewing for obvious reasons so the difficulty is not technical as the explanation is correct,the difficulty is the lack of a valid astronomical institution that can transmit the observation - nothing more and nothing less. The length of twilight correlates even better with the altitude of the sun at local noon transit. You are thicker than two short planks. -- Regards, Martin Brown |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Focal lengths and aperture | Srikant_S | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | May 12th 09 01:43 PM |
Roads that are also inportnant latitudes or longitudes | Carl Rogers | Misc | 4 | November 24th 05 07:39 AM |
Sky watchers at all latitudes should be alert for auroras | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | September 14th 05 06:21 PM |
A new approximation for elliptic arc lengths | Kaimbridge M. GoldChild | Misc | 1 | December 29th 04 09:49 PM |
total sunlight hours at different latitudes | Randall Plant | Misc | 5 | March 18th 04 12:12 PM |